IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-26.txt

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Sun, 20 May 2018 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B63812D876 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 May 2018 11:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3yLx2l7QGL9l for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 May 2018 11:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu (alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu [18.7.68.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CF012D86E for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 May 2018 11:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1207440e-7a7ff70000000ced-86-5b01c58ea0df
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 7C.F2.03309.F85C10B5; Sun, 20 May 2018 14:59:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PaulKyzivatsMBP.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w4KIxPu4006988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 May 2018 14:59:26 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <152520890128.24714.15252679013876821207.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <b6a96f81-98a1-e449-e6e3-e32fe88bcf7e@alum.mit.edu> <D70F3FDC.2F15F%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <41360307-3c41-93af-17e4-6aba7436e7cf@alum.mit.edu> <D7161810.2F54B%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <3a3ddef7-65d9-c6e7-f16d-4b5078c23198@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <28c542da-586c-c98a-e9c0-5e66cb512b05@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 14:59:25 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3a3ddef7-65d9-c6e7-f16d-4b5078c23198@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrLIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixO6iqDvhKGO0wasDzBZTlz9mcWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxonfwgX9nBXnf51jbmCcxN7FyMkhIWAi8XrCBGYQW0hgB5PE ofn2XYxcQPZ3Jol5qy4xgSTYBLQk5hz6zwJiCwvESnztOMQKYosICEvMePuXDaLhCpPEnBMv 2EASvAL2EuufrwZq5uBgEVCV+N2rChIWFUiTuL95EiNEiaDEyZlPwGZyCjhI3Fn2FewgZgEz iXmbHzJD2OISt57MZ4Kw5SWat85mnsDIPwtJ+ywkLbOQtMxC0rKAkWUVo1xiTmmubm5iZk5x arJucXJiXl5qka6xXm5miV5qSukmRkhI8u1gbF8vc4hRgINRiYfXoIQhWog1say4MvcQoyQH k5IoL5fV/yghvqT8lMqMxOKM+KLSnNTiQ4wSHMxKIrzKyxijhXhTEiurUovyYVLSHCxK4rxs JnujhATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLIyHBxKEryFR4AaBYtS01Mr0jJzShDSTBycIMN5gIYvBqnhLS5I zC3OTIfIn2LU5ZjyvL+HWYglLz8vVUqc1xmkSACkKKM0D24OLJW8YhQHekuYNw6kigeYhuAm vQJawgS0pOMQ0He8xSWJCCmpBsZe3Zq+TyuevOup9qmIdPY9b3j260Tnmc8mxXU+m2tX6XLo wv2a2OdeB55eOVN+zVAyxlyF795unZMa8aYMuk3MHz1YhZfX5nh42i59WJvymeNcVrDmxBd1 cVE+HaZiG757L83+FPrwHuuKsvpt/m8Lt9uIMqsdMX1x4pLhM60fdS8d+t9N1VRiKc5INNRi LipOBAD5RcH8AAMAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/xbGO6TObOz9dpA5N7hpAdvQOIGE>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-26.txt
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 18:59:32 -0000

[Resending due to the outage on the ietf mail server]

On 5/14/18 1:31 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:

>> Yes, but I think the text shall be consistent when we talk about complete
>> SDP elements/SDP fields: we either say ‘x- line’ or ‘x- field’.
> 
> It seems that the existing usage is consistently x-field. I find no 
> occurrences of "-line" or "- line" in the document.

Its easy to miss stuff when only looking using search. :-(

There is extremely widespread usage of '"X=" line' (for almost every 
value of X) in the document.

I started changing some of these to 'X-field ("X=" line)', but after 
looking at the results I am doubting that this is an improvement.

I hesitate to diverge too much from the established style, though that 
is certainly an option.

I am thinking about changing the first occurrence to '"X=" line 
(X-field)' to establish the linkage to the ABNF. And then otherwise 
leave the usage as just '"X=" line'.

That at least establishes that they may be used as synonyms.

I'm about ready to publish a version with all the "field" changes, but 
I'd like to get feedback on this first.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email