Re: [Mobopts] RE: aviation industry

I think that it depends on the requirements and design decisions.
If the solution is based on existing technologies (with minor modifications)
then probably it is not interfering with netlmm. (i.e. IP address 
changes on handover).
How would you approach the work?
In our understanding a problem statement draft is the next logical step.
Do you have major concerns?

telemaco

James Kempf wrote:

>The requirements were designed for network-based localized mobility
>management, which includes Layer 3 handover support. One area of
>orthogonality might be whether or not the IP address changes on handover. In
>netlmm, it doesn't. With network-based handover support, it might. Is that
>what you mean?
>
>            jak
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Telemaco Melia" <telemaco.melia@netlab.nec.de>
>To: "James Kempf" <Kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
>Cc: "Davis, Terry L" <terry.l.davis@boeing.com>; <mobopts@irtf.org>;
><netlmm@ngnet.it>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 6:04 AM
>Subject: Re: [Mobopts] RE: aviation industry
>
>
>  
>
>>Thanks James for the hint.
>>I ll read the document carefully, however from a first impression I have
>>the feeling the issues
>>are orthogonal. Wrong assumption?
>>
>>regards,
>>telemaco
>>
>>James Kempf wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Telemaco,
>>>
>>>Please take a look at:
>>>
>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kempf-netlmm-nohost-req-00.txt
>>>
>>>This is a list of requirements for network-based localized mobility
>>>mangagement we discussed at the netlmm BOF. If there are any changes
>>>      
>>>
>needed,
>  
>
>>>let us know and we can put them in.
>>>
>>>BTW, if you want to subscribe to the netlmm mailing list, it is at:
>>>
>>>https://vesuvio.ipv6.cselt.it/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
>>>
>>>       jak
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Davis, Terry L" <terry.l.davis@boeing.com>
>>>To: "Telemaco Melia" <telemaco.melia@netlab.nec.de>
>>>Cc: <mobopts@irtf.org>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:04 AM
>>>Subject: [Mobopts] RE: aviation industry
>>>
>>>
>>>Telemaco
>>>
>>>I have promised to provide a draft of aviation requirements to Jim
>>>Kempf; so it will show up in the next few months.
>>>
>>>Take care
>>>Terry
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Telemaco Melia [mailto:telemaco.melia@netlab.nec.de]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 2:13 AM
>>>To: Davis, Terry L
>>>Cc: ruilaa@det.ua.pt; njs@av.it.pt; mobopts@irtf.org
>>>Subject: Re: aviation industry
>>>
>>>Davis, Terry L wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Rui/Telemanco/Nuno
>>>>
>>>>I found your presentation on v6 Network Initiated handoff very
>>>>interesting, especially the dual homed support, which is a requirement
>>>>of the aviation industry.
>>>>
>>>>Take care
>>>>Terry
>>>>
>>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-melia-mobopts-niho-fmip-01.tx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>t
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Hi Terry,
>>>
>>>this is good to know.
>>>Could you give more hints on what aviation industry is expecting?
>>>Maybe you have some published documents on such a matter...
>>>
>>>regards,
>>>telemaco
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Mobopts mailing list
>>>Mobopts@irtf.org
>>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts@irtf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts