Re: [Mobopts] Multimob and security

Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@nsn.com> Mon, 03 December 2007 21:42 UTC

Return-path: <mobopts-bounces@irtf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzJ3r-0005bg-8p; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:42:43 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzImL-0006ez-Qr for mobopts@irtf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:24:37 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230] helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzImJ-0005Xj-DV for mobopts@irtf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:24:37 -0500
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id lB3LO2xt019142; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:24:15 +0200
Received: from daebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.112]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:23:45 +0200
Received: from daebe103.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.24]) by daebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:23:25 -0600
Received: from 10.241.59.18 ([10.241.59.18]) by daebe103.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.24]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:23:24 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.4.060510
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:23:27 -0800
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] Multimob and security
From: Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@nsn.com>
To: ext Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>, mobopts@irtf.org
Message-ID: <C379B3CF.1D960%rajeev.koodli@nsn.com>
Thread-Topic: [Mobopts] Multimob and security
Thread-Index: Acg18r47/Je5TKHlEdyKDQAWy5YJpw==
In-Reply-To: <20071203191218.GH2478@steelhead.localdomain>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Dec 2007 21:23:25.0136 (UTC) FILETIME=[BD1F4500:01C835F2]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:42:41 -0500
Cc:
X-BeenThere: mobopts@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility Optimizations <mobopts.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mobopts@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mobopts-bounces@irtf.org

Hi Yoshi,


On 12/3/07 11:12 AM, "ext Yoshihiro Ohba" <yohba@tari.toshiba.com> wrote:

> Shouldn't multimob work also consider security aspect for securing
> IGMP/MLD where MN does not have a pre-established security association
> with the visited network?
> 

Okay, but could you state why we should do this? Is this specific to
mobility?

Regards,

-Rajeev
-- 
http://people.nokia.net/~rajeev



> Yoshihiro Ohba
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mobopts mailing list
> Mobopts@irtf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts





_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts@irtf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts