[Mobopts] Re: Review of Draft draft-schmidt-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps-00.txt
Thomas Schmidt <schmidt@fhtw-berlin.de> Mon, 12 December 2005 11:21 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Elljp-000406-0b; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:21:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Elljn-000401-Cz for mobopts@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:20:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA06162 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:20:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail1.rz.fhtw-berlin.de ([141.45.5.103]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EllkZ-0007lD-0L for mobopts@irtf.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:21:48 -0500
Received: from [141.22.17.128] (helo=[141.22.17.128]) by mail1.rz.fhtw-berlin.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1Elljk-000JiN-O1; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:20:56 +0100
Message-ID: <439D5DB2.5000806@fhtw-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:23:30 +0100
From: Thomas Schmidt <schmidt@fhtw-berlin.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
References: <4374ED41.60506@fhtw-berlin.de> <4391E6DA.2010300@fhtw-berlin.de> <20051208114105.GC9534@tyholt.uninett.no> <43982331.5050303@fhtw-berlin.de> <20051211215653.GC10279@tyholt.uninett.no> <439D5507.6090705@fhtw-berlin.de> <20051212111012.GC29311@tyholt.uninett.no>
In-Reply-To: <20051212111012.GC29311@tyholt.uninett.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Matthias Waehlisch <mw@fhtw-berlin.de>, mobopts <mobopts@irtf.org>
Subject: [Mobopts] Re: Review of Draft draft-schmidt-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mobopts@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: schmidt@fhtw-berlin.de
List-Id: IP Mobility Optimizations <mobopts.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mobopts@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mobopts-bounces@irtf.org
Errors-To: mobopts-bounces@irtf.org
Stig Venaas wrote: > > One thing I didn't mention though. You say that establishing the > multicast forwarding trees may take 30s and more. I would say that > with PIM it should be down to a couple of seconds unless there are > broken implementations or packet loss. Note that some work is going > on to make PIM joins/prunes reliable, which might help regarding > loss. Even a few seconds is too long though, and in rare cases it > might take longer. So I agree we need a solution for mobility. > PIM-SM usually is much faster, provided the shared distribution tree routed at the RP is established, yes. For initial communication/ continuation it's merely given by the distance MSource to RP. The statement was once again an attempt to remain neutral w.r.t. multicast routing protocols. thomas _______________________________________________ Mobopts mailing list Mobopts@irtf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
- [Mobopts] Re: Review of Draft draft-schmidt-mobop… Thomas Schmidt
- [Mobopts] Re: Review of Draft draft-schmidt-mobop… Thomas Schmidt
- [Mobopts] Re: Review of Draft draft-schmidt-mobop… Thomas Schmidt