Re: [Mobopts] Re: [Mip6] [Fwd: FW:resubmit draft-irtf-mobopts-locat ion-privacy-ps-00.txtwith revised boilerplate]

[Qiu Ying <[e-mail]>]

Hi,
Yes, RFC3775 only mentions that the SQN should be larger than the previous one. The new issue is how to let the receiver know the increment if we does not use a fixed one..
-- Qiu Ying

----- Original Message -----
From: Rajeev Koodli <[e-mail]>
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 1:30 am
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] Re: [Mip6] [Fwd: FW:resubmit	draft-irtf-mobopts-locat ion-privacy-ps-00.txtwith revised	boilerplate]

> 
> 
> Ryuji Wakikawa wrote:
> 
> > Hi Wassim
> > 
> > I agree most of implementation today just increment one for 
> sequence  
> > number.
> > Is there any description in RFC3775  saying that MN must 
> increment  
> > sequentially for Seq number?
> 
> I was looking for that. I could not find text that says the Sequence
> Number must be incremented by one. The only requirement is that it is
> greater than the previous one.
> 
> -Rajeev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > ryuji
> > 
> > 
> > On 2005/07/12, at 12:50, Wassim Haddad wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Rajeev,
> >>
> >> Thanks for writing this draft.
> >>
> >> I just want to add that tracing the BU messages via the sequence 
> number
> >> can also reveal in real time to an eavesdropper the path taken 
> by an
> >> unknown mobile node, i.e., by linking the BU messages and 
> consequently>> the pseudo-IP addresses.
> >> However, the ability to follow the movements in real time, 
> combined  with
> >> some prior infos about one particular target can lead to break 
> the  
> >> user's
> >> anonymity.
> >>
> >> IMHO, it makes sense to add such scenario in the problem statement.
> >>
> >> We have addressed this particular issue in our "anonymity and  
> >> unlinkability
> >> solution for omipv6" (draft-haddad-privacy-omipv6-anonymity-00).
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Wassim H.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Rajeev Koodli wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hello folks,
> >>>
> >>> I submitted the draft on Friday, I believe with the correct  
> boilerplate>>> (see attached draft). I still got an error message.
> >>>
> >>> Anyway, please find the Location Privacy Problem Statement draft.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> -Rajeev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> From:     Koodli Rajeev (Nokia-NRC/MtView)
> >>>> Sent:    Friday, July 08, 2005 7:42 PM
> >>>> To:    '[e-mail]'
> >>>> Subject:    resubmit draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy- ps-
> 00.txt 
> >>>> with revised boilerplate
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Here it is..
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> -Rajeev Koodli
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>  <<draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-ps-00.txt>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> http://people.nokia.net/~rajeev
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mobopts mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mip6 mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mobopts mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
> 


_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts