IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mobopts] draft-vogt-mobopts-simple-cba-00.txt

Christian Vogt <chvogt@tm.uka.de> Tue, 21 February 2006 07:32 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBS0m-0003uA-CQ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:32:40 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBS0m-0003u4-0A for mobopts@irtf.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:32:40 -0500
Received: from iramx1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.10.80]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBS0k-0006dp-MJ for mobopts@irtf.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:32:39 -0500
Received: from i72ms2.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.70.17] helo=smtp.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de) by iramx1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps id 1FBS0V-000478-K7; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:32:28 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:2001:638:204:6:20c:6eff:fe40:8d95] (archimedes.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de [IPv6:2001:638:204:6:20c:6eff:fe40:8d95]) by smtp.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA268541; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:32:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <43FAC206.6060900@tm.uka.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:32:22 +0100
From: Christian Vogt <chvogt@tm.uka.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050923 Thunderbird/1.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg Daley <gregd@research.panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] draft-vogt-mobopts-simple-cba-00.txt
References: <43F4C04A.9030807@research.panasonic.com>
In-Reply-To: <43F4C04A.9030807@research.panasonic.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Report: -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Cc: mobopts@irtf.org
X-BeenThere: mobopts@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Mobility Optimizations <mobopts.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mobopts@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mobopts-bounces@irtf.org

Hi Greg,

sorry for the late response.  Was out of town for a few days.

Yes, the intention for writing draft-vogt-mobopts-simple-cba-00.txt was 
to finally provide a document that is ready for publication.

"Simple CBA" refers to the basic (and easy-to-implement) mode where the 
correspondent node measures a mobile node's effort in terms of the 
packets received from that mobile node.  I got the impression that this 
mode seems to be widely considered mature in the community now.

Simple CBA is a product of the Mobopts Research Group.  And so is the 
rest of CBA, which is a bit less simply and more researchy, though. 
Hence, I agree with you that publication as an Experimental or Standards 
Track RFC would be suitable for Simple CBA, while the prospective IRTF 
Research Track would be more appropriate for the rest of CBA, IMO.

Regards,
- Christian

-- 
Christian Vogt, Institute of Telematics, Universitaet Karlsruhe (TH)
www.tm.uka.de/~chvogt/pubkey/


Greg Daley wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just read the draft of the new CBA, and think it's
> in good shape to progress toward publication.
> It looks like the document has been made
> straightforward and concise.
> 
> What's the plan?
> 
> Is the aim to get it put out as an experimental RFC
> here, or get the document adopted and reviewed in IETF?
> 
> Greg



_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts@irtf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email