[Mod-discuss] Re: Next steps for modpod after WGLC
Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Fri, 19 September 2025 19:42 UTC
Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BAD65C2CE0 for <mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDRm2tslev9r for <mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EEF965C178A for <mod-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3ed20bdfdffso2533305f8f.2 for <mod-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1758310586; x=1758915386; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CiT8oMQV6y5uscgbxd0IukxO+OfySsnoXj/jnqAZdVM=; b=IusLCMJ5STN0ULl702v+XF7N6p8asj0NaEiPmVk/zIj5AD2r8unDUYksBUyjbuFv3W cSsyTD3aMgJy4MnXYRZxoLyQ5Pz+g1UwMKYIRtSP9enVCwhP0oF0xBdz+LyfxGnzYxZl WzfEnYrzFft4Cbu1z58NzrHxdEfLihuMG2eW7YyP32v7zipRaNPs5Z2iIjVSlgwiCe0p mBoHWVcT9u0dTUMUjuErRNpGT553fPbShd9g3BGx11xeVd59lJuKYaz2YIQMPHo4h26z okyH/SrPhcoj1hgNs4DoNW83Ys8nbZoG13UCrGk2Ikvy6BubVvRpRS98H9+IS8lYlg54 3SMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758310586; x=1758915386; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CiT8oMQV6y5uscgbxd0IukxO+OfySsnoXj/jnqAZdVM=; b=qCba0+p9dcJpHvbH7IXwLrAwHvZiajy6juZOjcQVbBB6J2YXjj/ViYhQxBce4VAzMY rqtpIrY6w7eGICIndAhhCCw9dUXAfODJwI8+3RIfYkwj68cXP3BcLsJ5Geh6aIqCa5lk q12qPPZ1s2DPon6veNxxTWaskJ1V9mlBIWNHv/SjqDWBPK/vZfBUobI0leviFowBCQsJ 7bYuze7JJ6ja3q5q93nFAORo35sv1gjogHPm9/doAN2fmkX1FVi/oBry1wUudsUnc5GZ nbL5TCCc80RZB4ZSQl9wFtx5dipOVZcX/DpeMgEC7mVayYi18nVJa8Uy6Rd3qYogvPEy 4ltg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyM/1v7qEasmciJJs1QlQz8vklu2i2U6HHIW6NC6q51oqs7vz4u 0/eqDve+s7A068AMUA8vR2JEadaw1JhnHJh7CSuFdD1q6F/JNGRNbO1fGu9Wqh8gjeb65tFSaIJ Y7DNXDPzo9RtBXG1L/TdVSrTlexUxULc=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctO59KXj55w7STkvtXoJYR7ObHQJjIyW/YebmiSNdF44lwWL+UGQ9aUZVuUpr6 CjP1nMJ94lhbwl/0Nn683tM+T0Iy6YzmQxeFHdcslIz/33i3lqHa+0ij1SzmMMfERahVnZRNGnV Fb2F+TeevMocMtyuCKgDstEov43ViPF2Y3bMaBdfZX9l8S9XhJVbozFHOmOfW5V5N7iH3xBOm7w 8ffKTVp+YBssYPEv7+TGWOL9uDZt4+YddRsiBlq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHbXpq8XXXH+4NQXb5QUaoQfEw0MCb51on20t00YSSdhZ8oCJDdO/CdwpbnF0fwKZTeVXG0/pHm5/GzzbRYFGE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2911:b0:3eb:5e99:cbd3 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3ee7c5535cdmr3898834f8f.2.1758310586124; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEi+uC4deDJS1BBC=LHyu3LgDHo9SFgUt3czteLt24ey7D6prA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEi+uC4deDJS1BBC=LHyu3LgDHo9SFgUt3czteLt24ey7D6prA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:13 -0700
X-Gm-Features: AS18NWDppTd3ujVH0ae6YDai3LXWhF1ecOD7L45q663KJksUFpkSlUmX8kAb-Ys
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=AsV+5wq-xsVnc3xLs8PoBsMB2dO9a0tAA3XpPvvF24Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: 3A4KWFOGPR5X2KVCDPOGEZMYHWTOFHOQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3A4KWFOGPR5X2KVCDPOGEZMYHWTOFHOQ
X-MailFrom: watsonbladd@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-0; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-1; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-2; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-3; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-4; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-5; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-6; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-7; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-8; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-9; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-10; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-11; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Moderation Discussion <mod-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Mod-discuss] Re: Next steps for modpod after WGLC
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF moderation policies and practices <mod-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mod-discuss/lOeQ3gF-M1XFedhpu07TisZVeh8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mod-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:mod-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mod-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mod-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mod-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mod-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 10:40 AM Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > We had a lot of strong review and suggestions for the WG draft. The authors have already been working with those suggestions and are starting to think about a next draft. > > Once a new draft is out we're going to do a second WGLC. The bar for accepting suggestions is going to be higher; more topics will be ruled out of scope including issues we've separately called consensus for. There's lots of reason to expect that many more people will be paying attention now than were earlier. There have been some pretty clear areas where people don't all agree, and a number of issues that might need some more discussion. I don't think saying earlier consensus still holds automatically and narrowing the scope is a good idea: if consensus still holds it doesn't need to be enforced artificially. Sincerely, Watson > > Thank you! > Lisa > _______________________________________________ > Mod-discuss mailing list -- mod-discuss@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mod-discuss-leave@ietf.org -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
- [Mod-discuss] Next steps for modpod after WGLC Lisa Dusseault
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Next steps for modpod after WGLC Keith Moore
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Next steps for modpod after WGLC Michael De Roover
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Next steps for modpod after WGLC Watson Ladd