Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 to Proposed Standard

Bob Hinden <hinden@ipsilon.com> Mon, 01 May 1995 18:33 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07037; 1 May 95 14:33 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07033; 1 May 95 14:33 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12614; 1 May 95 14:33 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07026; 1 May 95 14:33 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07020; 1 May 95 14:33 EDT
Received: from [131.119.245.5] by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12599; 1 May 95 14:33 EDT
Received: from ipsilon.com by nic1.barrnet.net (8.6.10/BARRNET-RELAY.1) id LAA24653; Mon, 1 May 1995 11:33:14 -0700
Received: from [204.160.240.224] (acacia.ipsilon.COM) by ipsilon.com (4.1/SMI-4.1MDV1.0) id AA15568; Mon, 1 May 95 11:32:04 PDT
X-Sender: hinden@mailhost.ipsilon.com
Message-Id: <v02120c0eabcad8ef518f@[204.160.240.224]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 11:33:18 -0700
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Bob Hinden <hinden@ipsilon.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2 to Proposed Standard
Cc: hinden@ipsilon.com, IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

IESGers,

At 2:19 PM 5/1/95, IESG Secretary wrote:
>The IESG has received a request from the ONC Remote Procedure Call
>Working Group to consider the following three Internet-Drafts  for the
>status of Proposed Standard:
>
>1. RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2
>        <draft-ietf-oncrpc-rpcv2-01.txt>
>2. XDR: External Data Representation Standard
>        <draft-ietf-oncrpc-xdr-01.txt>
>3. Binding Protocols for ONC RPC Version 2
>        <draft-ietf-oncrpc-bind-00.txt>
>
>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the
>iesg@cnri.reston.va.us or ietf@cnri.reston.va.us mailing lists by May
>15, 1995.

I support moving these protocols to proposed standard.  They are well
proven technology and are an important addition to the protocols which the
IETF standardizes.

Bob