Re: [Monami6] Flow Filtering - Issue 1

Hello Asanga

Your scenario is investigated in the draft. 
Please check the appendix B ?!

thanks
ryuji

At Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:44:47 +0100,
Asanga Udugama wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> >From all these drafts, I get the feeling that you do not consider MN
> will ever come to it's home network.
> 
> Look at this case,
> 
> What would a MN do if one of it's interfaces is connected to a foreign
> network and one is in the home network. As far as I understand MIP will
> not work as the HA cannot perform proxy ARPing in one case and NOT do
> proxy ARPing in the other case.
> 
> I propose that we have some rule such as saying,
> 
> "When at least one interface of the MN comes to home network, all the
> bindings related to other interfaces have to be deregistered." 
> 
> Please give your comments.
> 
> Thanks & kind regards,
> Asanga
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: monami6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:monami6-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf
> > Of Nicolas Montavont
> > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 5:21 PM
> > To: Monami6 WG
> > Subject: [Monami6] flows/binding policies exchange
> > 
> > Folks,
> > 
> > After some private discussions, authors of the following drafts agree
> > to work together to merge their work in order to fit to the 4th WG
> > deliverable:
> > 
> >      - draft-soliman-flow-move (http://standards.ericsson.net/karim/
> > draft-soliman-mobileip-flow-move-03.txt)
> >      - draft-nomadv6-mobileip-filters (http://www.ietf.org/internet-
> > drafts/draft-nomadv6-mobileip-filters-03.txt)
> >      - draft-montavont-mobileip-ha-filtering (http://clarinet.u-
> > strasbg.fr/~montavont/ietf/draft-montavont-mobileip-ha-filtering-
> > v6-00.txt)
> > 
> > Here is a summary of the issues that these drafts try to address when
> > we consider flow redirection (let's thank Koojana for this summary):
> > 
> > 1. Distribution of flows based on multiple flow distribution and
> single
> > flow distribution
> > 
> > 2. Criterias that have to be added to identify a flow for the
> > distribution (Almost all the criterias are based on the filelds of the
> > header details (as explained in the current drafts))
> > 
> > 3. How to  define those criteria (Fixed format /Flexible format)
> > 
> > 4. How to inform these criteria (Attached to the BU & BA messages)
> > 
> > 5. Should we include dropping a flow feature?
> > 
> > 6. Who should distribute the flows? HA and MAP, CN?
> > 
> > 7. Who should inform the criteria? MN?
> > 
> > In order to initiate discussion on these issues, feel free to comment
> > each issue. Please write emails with subject line  "flow filtering -
> > issue XX" to address your comment. We would like to gather results of
> > the discussion for the Monami6 session.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > the chairs.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Monami6 mailing list
> > Monami6@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Monami6 mailing list
> Monami6@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
> 

_______________________________________________
Monami6 mailing list
Monami6@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6

Re: [Monami6] Flow Filtering - Issue 1 - Distribution of Flows baed on ....