RE: [Monami6] Re: [Mip6] HAHA and HA reliability

Well... These arguments are valid.

OTOH, HAHA is about getting rid of the home link, placing MIP/NEMO at
L3.
The objectives are mostly route optimization and load balancing. In
that, it seems a bit far from MONAMI. But there's no NEMO RO WG/BOF ;)

I think it's a matter of having the right people discuss the subject. If
we can raise interest in MONAMI, then MONAMI is the right place.

Pascal
>-----Original Message-----
>From: monami6-bounces@lists.ietf.org
[mailto:monami6-bounces@lists.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thierry
>Ernst
>Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 5:12 AM
>To: mip6@ietf.org; ml-monami6
>Subject: [Monami6] Re: [Mip6] HAHA and HA reliability
>
>
>Hi,
>
>On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:10:59 -0700
>Vijay Devarapalli <vijayd@iprg.nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> hi folks,
>>
>> since we are on the topic of HA reliability, we recently revised
>> and submitted a draft on HA reliability based on the HAHA
>> protocol. you can find it at
>>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-devarapalli-mip6-nemo-local-ha
ha-00.txt
>> It has been completely re-written. it also has a section on using
>> VRRPv6 with HAHA. comments are welcome.
>>
>> HAHA in general supports placing HAs in geographically separate
>> locations while still serving the same home prefix. this is
>> described in
>>
http://www.mobilenetworks.org/nemo/drafts/draft-thubert-nemo-global-haha
-00.txt
>>
>> the HAHA messages are defined in
>>
http://www.mobilenetworks.org/nemo/drafts/draft-wakikawa-mip6-nemo-haha-
spec-00.txt
>
>In the case where HA are placed in geographically separate locations,
>this is indeed a multihoming configuration as defined in
>draft-montavont-mobileip-multihoming-pb-statement (for host mobility)
>and draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues (for network mobility).
>
>As such, and since it covers for MIP6 and NEMO,  I think it falls into
>the scope of the Monami6 BOF (http://www.nautilus6.org/ietf). However,
>we have not yet initiated the discussion on this topic on the Monami6
ML
>and it may be too much discussion for the BOF. If Monami6 can
>become a WG, I think it should be added in our charter as a Monami6 WG
>item.
>
>Thierry
>
>_______________________________________________
>Monami6 mailing list
>Monami6@lists.ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6

_______________________________________________
Monami6 mailing list
Monami6@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6