Re: [Mops] draft-giuliano-treedn adoption call

zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn Tue, 06 December 2022 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2ED9C14CE41; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 00:06:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id urtSLoKa3bgN; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 00:06:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AA9FC14F74D; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 00:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4NRCg66tYMz8RV7J; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:06:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.200]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 2B686RdY077924; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:06:28 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:06:30 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 16:06:30 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa638ef806ffffffffd20c35a0
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202212061606305902913@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nWy0XJcph62k7cRkdgLcJ8dqKh9xEi-3FuTQr9PWOWdWA@mail.gmail.com>
References: CAJU8_nWy0XJcph62k7cRkdgLcJ8dqKh9xEi-3FuTQr9PWOWdWA@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
To: krose@krose.org
Cc: mops@ietf.org, draft-giuliano-treedn.authors@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 2B686RdY077924
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.137.novalocal with ID 638EF812.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1670314002/4NRCg66tYMz8RV7J/638EF812.000/10.5.228.132/[10.5.228.132]/mse-fl1.zte.com.cn/<zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 638EF812.000/4NRCg66tYMz8RV7J
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/U9y9pNPrUevF9-x19duQ3r4_V0o>
Subject: Re: [Mops] draft-giuliano-treedn adoption call
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 08:06:51 -0000

Dear MOPS chairs, 


I listened the presentation of TreeDN draft in IETF 115 MOPS, MBONED and PIM working group meeting. 


I do think the draft is very useful. I support the adoption of this draft.


Thanks,


Sandy


















Original



From: KyleRose <krose@krose.org>
To: MOPS Working Group <mops@ietf.org>;
Cc: draft-giuliano-treedn.authors@ietf.org <draft-giuliano-treedn.authors@ietf.org>;
Date: 2022年12月06日 10:56
Subject: [Mops] draft-giuliano-treedn adoption call




--  
Mops mailing list
Mops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops




In consultation with Lenny post-115, the authors and chairs have jointly agreed that MOPS is an appropriate venue for work on the TreeDN draft. Given lopsided support in the 115 MOPS session on the question of adoption, the main question we're posing here is:




Are there any objections to MOPS adopting this work?




Expressions of support for adoption are also, of course, welcome on the list, as well as expressions of intent to read and contribute to development of the draft.




Thanks,

Kyle + Leslie