Re: [Moq] Virtual or In-person MOQ interim meeting before IETF 117? (was: Re: Unofficial MOQers meetup after MHV (May 11th))

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 May 2023 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B253C13AE46; Tue, 2 May 2023 10:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nb_hCK0dqJIh; Tue, 2 May 2023 10:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF42C13AE20; Tue, 2 May 2023 10:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1ab13da70a3so6038865ad.1; Tue, 02 May 2023 10:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683048521; x=1685640521; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0tP/Wgi0PCbPCmRrY95BVr8BYFoqx114KbyvXwVseLk=; b=dMo0TzEzV2KXR/b/LR8kGMVzyfXMXI2g9Fp/GOAcR9osaKG8YMSbxJGc2e07E0Kw4O xbAOJ45OZhWnJHIxb0tKqUFSG6dbMyXFu5SACvc7tCBuGeCh/ScfkCsXfClwqaxs73oI zlhsT6YN6mvJ6KrDCxFxoXfCsKtNHVyxjjUUfGmUG1tzHT5EmiRdF8RhCBKw7diBIblW +0F6E4/PA5KSByIqREOO0OzBr58RtjgiaPPnCVhLOVoF67mHprzdhhbllk3nR0BGM7ij hCYKuhUY9TispuPooHCcuy/UrpIiuSVgKX/m2k88Ott85DRTKSLXzGPcTquG/q2n72LF fPMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683048521; x=1685640521; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=0tP/Wgi0PCbPCmRrY95BVr8BYFoqx114KbyvXwVseLk=; b=faGHr9V6qY9wdDkLtb9HckzdDbSE7fum8DXESwEPU8t8dDEU+lQj4wfL9XHid/S7D5 flACHa+DLHygWYmBgH4HUDDw8Wpo9q6C7r2YhY5PjQRu4gxDkMSq/BsAKnVw2e+pB9UW wlvZQmG5l+wyYhkPdpkwe1EWPkQYBf+1izwc13G0j0JYc9tykMYvqtAs8HOZUlNL5HDi qI41S2TGfBhQgVLbreDJV9rqIIJTFPIO1FibMtnf0Qi2IYn2PlNIJJnAsbZ+RNGXLbkW LTP2oFZLkF4aGM78yQfcKWgfKGYAGr7Sfjkh/kv0xatNYZKs06JsopiuL3k2NexGUTHz 6Gyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzWcSEBLY38ZyrS2cG7FZgYLHb2djHWstzzULQK7ZvjwRUbIfBi 4NbnwH5jRo/c4x7U533VS513KmoN5sXVXyEj/LQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5rYBDEqh1NmpYVG8f5q/zDvQ3ZTwXof62R/vyWtCjEymEcf99MMCSQQ7BOfaLNxfek47SbI3APNjUW2fQXd6o=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ecc7:b0:1aa:fdab:24a5 with SMTP id a7-20020a170902ecc700b001aafdab24a5mr7140359plh.10.1683048520738; Tue, 02 May 2023 10:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAA4Mcztnr=Qo6pshMUq8CGqffOtChp83cyvmbirhR=5WwZ6utw@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4McztsfvVq+OFP5-iTkbC6+DajS6+7=NsB2ztfw_oAgQDfVg@mail.gmail.com> <CE74B61E-4005-4F67-A1B1-03EAC2EC97F3@networked.media> <CAKKJt-deOnZJip-7UKHHQeRkkfdjFsydAQPrYP19ENrRPjNTiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMB9TyRi0vyREiGj_9tZchV5rJOPRJ6f=w-A0_nF7LRCyg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMB9TyRi0vyREiGj_9tZchV5rJOPRJ6f=w-A0_nF7LRCyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 12:28:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eBHVY1kOhix2epcgvxhRJRwdbXki3T1QPZtsDhZ8Gfsg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: moq-chairs@ietf.org, MOQ Mailing List <moq@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000037ecb205fab9454b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/moq/EGmV8Kzbo9z9O90MEI2OQu0XRcY>
Subject: Re: [Moq] Virtual or In-person MOQ interim meeting before IETF 117? (was: Re: Unofficial MOQers meetup after MHV (May 11th))
X-BeenThere: moq@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media over QUIC <moq.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/moq/>
List-Post: <mailto:moq@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 17:28:45 -0000

Hi, Ted,

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:03 AM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Spencer,
>
> The chairs and authors have been working together on this; we would like
> to schedule a virtual prior to IETF 117, but the timing depends on a new
> version being ready for review.  I think we should have a proposal to the
> WG on dates fairly soon for one or two three hour meetings.
>

This all sounds most excellent. One question - by "a new version being
ready for review", which draft(s) do you have in mind?

When we saw your reply, James and I were talking about near-term issues and
PRs for https://github.com/fiestajetsam/draft-gruessing-moq-requirements,
based on the comments we got from the working group adoption poll, so that
one shouldn't be too far in the future (probably in about two weeks).

Are you also waiting for a revision to
https://github.com/kixelated/warp-draft?


> We do not believe there is a chance of an in-person meeting at this point.
>

That's *very *helpful to know.


> We'll let you know as soon as we have more details.
>

Best,

Spencer


> regards,
>
> Ted hardie
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:53 PM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
> spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear MOQ chairs,
>>
>> I was one of the people hoping that we'd be able to meet, whether
>> officially or unofficially, atter Mile-High Video in Denver, but based on
>> Ali's feedback, it seems that would be a morning meeting of MOQ
>> participants who are already in Denver, and already packed for afternoon
>> flights (at most).
>>
>> Is there sufficient time left for us to schedule a virtual (or in-person)
>> interim meeting before IETF 117?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Spencer
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:45 AM Ali C. Begen <ali.begen=
>> 40networked.media@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> There has been some interest for this unofficial interim meeting on May
>>> 11th but not enough, I am afraid. Instead there are folks who are leaving
>>> Denver in the late afternoon. So, we will rather have a friendly meetup to
>>> discuss things f2f with those who are available (in the morning plus early
>>> afternoon). Details are to be announced during the MHV conference.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> -acbegen
>>>
>>> > On Apr 4, 2023, at 7:18 PM, Ali C. Begen <ali.begen@networked.media>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > The decision last week was not to have an official MOQ interim meeting
>>> right after the MHV conference, however, as many of you will already be in
>>> town and it looks like there is enough interest, I'd like to propose an
>>> unofficial meeting for MOQers on Thursday (May 11th). If you are
>>> interested, please email me directly and we will try to make a decision (go
>>> or no-go) in a week so people can adjust their travel plans accordingly.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>> > -acbegen
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> > From: Ali C. Begen <ali.begen@networked.media>
>>> > Date: Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 7:07 PM
>>> > Subject: Attend ACM Mile-High Video Conference in early May
>>> > To: MOPS Working Group <mops@ietf.org>, MOQ Mailing List <moq@ietf.org>,
>>> IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > Many of you are already aware of this, but for those who are not, the
>>> next Mile-High Video conference will be in Denver, CO, in early May. If you
>>> are working on media encoding, streaming, transport, applications or any
>>> related standards, this is an event you don't want to miss.
>>> >
>>> > The program, in a nutshell, is like this:
>>> > May 7:
>>> > Four tutorials on dash.js development, file format standards, codecs
>>> and VMAF.
>>> > Welcome reception
>>> >
>>> > May 8:
>>> > Technical talks
>>> > (There is a QUIC video session with five talks)
>>> > Happy hour sponsored by Amazon
>>> >
>>> > May 9:
>>> > Technical talks
>>> > Happy hour sponsored by Comcast
>>> >
>>> > May 10:
>>> > Technical talks
>>> >
>>> > All the details regarding the program and registration are available
>>> here:
>>> > https://www.mile-high.video
>>> >
>>> > If you have any questions, please let me know.
>>> >
>>> > -acbegen
>>> > (on behalf of the organizing committee)
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Moq mailing list
>>> Moq@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq
>>>
>> --
>> Moq mailing list
>> Moq@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq
>>
>