Re: [Moq] Report on adoption call comments for draft-gruessing-moq-requirements-04 and submission of working group -00

[Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[e-mail]>]

Fumes to self.--  *the MOQ virtual interim meeting is, of course, scheduled
for JUNE 7th. *

*I'm not sending another email before Monday, I swear. *

On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 10:03 AM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> My apologies for the typo -
>
> Grrr.
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 9:35 AM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Dear MoQ Chairs,
>>
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    We have made changes to draft-gruessing-moq-requirements-04
>>    <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gruessing-moq-requirements-04>
>>    based on adoption poll comments from Bernard Aboba and Lucas Pardue, and a
>>    private review from Alan Frindell (thanks to these folks for your
>>    comments).
>>    -
>>
>>    We have received no further comments on the issues we identified as "
>>    ForAdoption
>>    <https://github.com/fiestajetsam/draft-gruessing-moq-requirements/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3AForAdoption>"
>>    in the GitHub repository
>>    <https://github.com/fiestajetsam/draft-gruessing-moq-requirements/tree/main>
>>    or on the associated PRs, which have been summarized to the working group
>>    mailing list in weekly summary reports since IETF 116.
>>    -
>>
>>    We have submitted the updated draft as
>>    draft-gruessing-moq-requirements-05
>>    <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gruessing-moq-requirements-05>
>>    .
>>    -
>>
>>    Unless you, the chairs, tell us not to, we plan to submit our -05 as
>>    a -00 WG version on Monday, June 5nd, changing only the filename of the
>>    draft.
>>    -
>>
>>    We look forward to making additional progress with the -00 WG version
>>    between now and IETF 117
>>    -
>>
>>    In particular, we would like to review issues in the GitHub
>>    repository during the upcoming MoQ virtual Interim on June 9 that we will
>>    tag for IETF117 .
>>    -
>>
>>    Please consider this as a request for agenda time at the virtual
>>    interim meeting.
>>
>>
>> Please advise.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> James and Spencer
>>
>>
>> For reference ...
>>
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-gruessing-moq-requirements-05.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by James Gruessing and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name:           draft-gruessing-moq-requirements
>> Revision:       05
>> Title:          Media Over QUIC - Use Cases and Requirements for Media
>> Transport Protocol Design
>> Document date:  2023-05-31
>> Group:          Individual Submission
>> Pages:          17
>> URL:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gruessing-moq-requirements-05.txt
>> Status:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gruessing-moq-requirements/
>> Html:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gruessing-moq-requirements-05.html
>> Htmlized:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gruessing-moq-requirements
>> Diff:
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-gruessing-moq-requirements-05
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This document describes use cases and requirements that guide the
>>    specification of a simple, low-latency media delivery solution for
>>    ingest and distribution, using either the QUIC protocol or
>>    WebTransport.
>>
>>