IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MORG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-morg-list-specialuse-02.txt

Jamie Nicolson (倪志明) <nicolson@google.com> Mon, 30 August 2010 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <nicolson@google.com>
X-Original-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD46C3A699E for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UvE2XfkFBB7S for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42E73A6814 for <morg@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.101]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o7UIcm1H001962 for <morg@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:38:48 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1283193528; bh=rtZ77Mi2talWTmRXe9L6byJrSr8=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=rNs4dxz8SIYdobtRZapSJrtSUAixQFMlcv+GaohChhcNI2BrTKH1mlXSi5VeRKG40 CswSHvZvOnPU9PP4y27LA==
Received: from qyk9 (qyk9.prod.google.com [10.241.83.137]) by wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o7UIckhm028407 for <morg@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:38:47 -0700
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so5327889qyk.10 for <morg@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=BrmPl9mgg/J8myU8XMB7fE8rnhmvqIixgI3RYPHpih8=; b=Ak147pvNxrWzKzF/ZnhlhDCJlregz6iBA0eSmQqeTf6kbNm86kHyUj67O84bkUGuqH W1fILI3dST11PHYKrvHg==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=PB+mm8e2fxWlDX41R77w554HIdZaER7Cp9GpDGSMA+s2SL1miNMPZF0ze0H7nFhxts B4/OrqRCuofvTVFDtUBQ==
Received: by 10.224.11.6 with SMTP id r6mr3157668qar.210.1283193526515; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.124.71 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimafQgtOSTpKu2E-57jClCcZv9yE7_CbaJRKSTu@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1215224143.1688.1276914456927.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com> <C6A55EC7-8489-488C-9FD4-0E0718A8C7BF@iki.fi> <AANLkTinL2qLU5RZVrxzfUo2QW3dB80H9SBbmC9axDOpy@mail.gmail.com> <4C21D97F.5050806@isode.com> <AANLkTilZSXG0z2ol2PFsNv45Cxry28_Oh_iBGX9efDoo@mail.gmail.com> <4C224914.4070706@isode.com> <AANLkTikPqoNWAVgi-wIY7TAg_l4vaATviqxusUrLiAGh@mail.gmail.com> <4C226E22.5000007@isode.com> <AANLkTimafQgtOSTpKu2E-57jClCcZv9yE7_CbaJRKSTu@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Jamie Nicolson (倪志明)" <nicolson@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:38:26 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=P=FyEmjNR=qcY3t2hdzyQ54H_3hd0ex-g-9xX@mail.gmail.com>
To: barryleiba@computer.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015175cb1d4537b87048f0ec687"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: morg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MORG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-morg-list-specialuse-02.txt
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:38:23 -0000

I just re-read this thread and realized there was an unanswered question
addressed to me. Sorry about that. Barry, let me know if there's other ways
I can help with this spec.

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 13:59, Barry Leiba <
barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> I oppose that change, and would like to keep CREATE optional.  I don't
> >> want to set up a barrier for doing the extended-LIST implementation.
> >>
> >
> > To be clear: there is no need to implement the whole extended LIST. The
> > server can only implement handling of the new select and return options.
>
> That's still backward; it's not a question of needing to implement
> extended LIST.  The issue is, for a server that *does* implement
> extended LIST, whether implementing CREATE becomes mandatory.  I want
> it to remain optional, and so I think we need a second capability for
> it.
>

To me, it does seem valuable to separate the capabilities. For Google,
implementing extended list is more likely than supporting CREATE with
special-use flags. If I understand correctly, we wouldn't be able to
advertise support for the special-use return option without also supporting
CREATE with special-use flags.



>
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> MORG mailing list
> MORG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg
> Note Well: http://www.ietf.org/maillist.html
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email