Re: [MORG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-morg-sortdisplay-01.txt

Dan Karp <dkarp@zimbra.com> Sun, 18 October 2009 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dkarp@zimbra.com>
X-Original-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D5B3A692D for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PiQuJdfyuHS1 for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta02.zimbra.com (mta02.zimbra.com [207.126.229.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0433A67B2 for <morg@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta02.zimbra.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28555C78055; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.com
Received: from mta02.zimbra.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta02.zimbra.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5sBdcY4apmg5; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dogfood.zimbra.com (dogfood.zimbra.com [207.126.229.140]) by mta02.zimbra.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFF0C78051; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:15:44 -0700
From: Dan Karp <dkarp@zimbra.com>
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Message-ID: <1220649066.132.1255882544726.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
In-Reply-To: <505588568.457.1254843354599.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.2_GA_1910.RHEL4_64 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Mac)/6.0.2_GA_1910.RHEL4_64)
Cc: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>, barryleiba@computer.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>, morg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MORG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-morg-sortdisplay-01.txt
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:15:40 -0000

> > I wonder if these concerns could be addressed by defining the sort
> > key as equal to the addr-name sent by the server in response to
> > FETCH-ENVELOPE. IIRC that's still 2047-encoded, but "like the
> > addr-name you send for FETCH ENVELOPE, but 2047-decoded" is
> > realistic and still simple.
> 
> This is completely reasonable, and also very much in line with the
> rest of the base SORT draft.  Give me a bit of time and I'll try to
> rework the draft's wording to phrase it in terms that line up with the
> FETCH ENVELOPE response.

Revised and posted as the -02 version of the draft.  Please take a look
and let me know what you think.