IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MORG] THREAD= search return option in draft-ietf-morg-inthread-01.txt

Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi> Mon, 09 August 2010 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tss@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: morg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332FB3A68D4 for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 05:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.850, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c2WcBi-0k-vT for <morg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 05:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dovecot.org (dovecot.org [62.236.108.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A653A67EC for <morg@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 05:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.134.134.32] (pickles.tp.telepac.pt [194.65.5.228]) by dovecot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC5DFA8AEC; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 15:50:06 +0300 (EEST)
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <4C5FC7B8.1070404@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <4C50244C.8010401@isode.com> <4C57ECFA.3040504@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <4C58406A.7030205@isode.com> <4C5958FA.2010403@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <1281012526.6211.333.camel@kurkku.sapo.corppt.com> <4C5AB4C3.80007@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <8349DB2C-6D37-4B02-B9F6-9DA1834A3058@dankeen.com> <4C5FBBD4.6060906@isode.com> <4C5FC059.4070308@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <BE0D3DE6-9138-4ED1-A286-7E1A079BE272@iki.fi> <4C5FC7B8.1070404@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:50:03 +0100
Message-ID: <1281358203.2982.4.camel@kurkku.sapo.corppt.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: morg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MORG] THREAD= search return option in draft-ietf-morg-inthread-01.txt
X-BeenThere: morg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Organization <morg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg>
List-Post: <mailto:morg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg>, <mailto:morg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:49:37 -0000

On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 11:17 +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 11:11 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Why was search-alg even moved to a return option?..
> 
> Someone (perhaps you, but I'm not sure) suggested that any single search 
> command should never be able to use two different threading algorithms.

Since I already implemented it, I doubt it was me who suggested changing
it. :) But I remember someone said it would make it more complex to
allow multiple algorithms .. then again, to me the return option seems a
bit ugly/wrong place for it. Return options should control what is
returned from the finished search result, not change what messages
actually match the search query..

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email