[Mpls-interop] moving mpls-tp documents

I'll to try push the next round of documents to wg last call,
or have them accepted as wg documents asap. The discussions in
Ipswich gave a of input that should be captured in several
documents.

This also means that we need to to have a couple of documents
become wg documents. Here are the steps we need to take:

draft-andersson-mpls-tp-oam-def       (accept as a MEAD team doc?)  	
draft-beller-mpls-tp-gach-dcn 	      (accept as a MEAD team doc?)
draft-boutros-mpls-tp-cv              (accept as a MEAD team doc?)

draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault           (accept as a MEAD team doc?) 	
draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback 	      (comments and review need!) 	
draft-boutros-mpls-tp-performance     (accept as a MEAD team doc?)

draft-bryant-mpls-tp-ach-tlv          (accept as a MEAD team doc?) 	
draft-busi-mpls-tp-oam-framework      (update based on Ipswich
                                        discussion!) 	
draft-gray-mpls-tp-nm-req             (accept as a wg doc!)

draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework          (prepare for a wg last call, after
                                        the tp-requirements are wg last
                                        called)
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements   (we need to get existing comments
                                        written down, we will allow until
                                        Friday Jan 30 to do this, after
                                        that we'll prepare the doc for wg
                                        last call)
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements       (prepare for wg last call)

draft-martinotti-mpls-tp-interworking (accept as a MEAD team doc?) 	
draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-analysis   (update as soon as the
                                        oam-requirements are stable)
draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-survive-fwk    (document has expired and should
                                        be republished)

draft-yang-mpls-tp-ring-protection
-analysis                             (accept as a MEAD team doc?)

As a member of the MEAD team you are expected to respond to the
"accept as a MEAD team doc"?

As a a MEAD team member you are expected to supply your comments on
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements on Fri Jan 30, the latest.

As an editor you are supposed to take the action (when the time is
right) for the other document.

A reminder:

Becoming a MEAD team document means that there a strong element
in that draft that the MEAD needs to coordinate, it won't stop
us from splitting or merge documents, just that we will do so
in a coordinated way.

Becoming wg documents means positive response to three questions.

- does this document address a problem that the wg needs to
   solve
- is this document a good enough start to solve this problem
- is it within wg charter

/Loa

-- 

Loa Andersson

Sr Strategy and Standards Manager
Ericsson ///                          phone:  +46 8 632 77 14

                                       email:  loa.andersson@ericsson.com
                                               loa.andersson@redback.com
                                               loa@pi.nu

_______________________________________________
Mpls-interop mailing list
Mpls-interop@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop

[Mpls-interop] moving mpls-tp documents - you are supposed to respond