Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] the mpls working group klast calls on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv has ended

Hi Shahram,
I would not speak for Loa or authors of two documents you've asked. I think
that ACH TLV document will include, perhaps not right from the start, more
then MPLS-TP Identifiers. For example, in Anaheim was discussed to add
Timestamp TLV as ACH TLV rather than as extension of LSP-Ping.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>wrote:

> Hi Loa,
>
> This draft seems to define TLV formats for some of the identifiers defined
> in mpls-tp-identifiers draft. Is the intent to have another draft to define
> the remaining identifiers? Why not combine this draft with the identifiers
> draft?
>
> Thanks,
> Shahram
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Loa Andersson
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:14 AM
> To: mpls-tp@ietf.org; MPLS-TP ad hoc team; mpls@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] the mpls working group klast calls on
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv has ended
>
> All,
>
> the mpls working group last call on the ACH-TLV structure
> (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv) has ended.
>
>
> > ACH-TLV structure draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv
> > The ongoing MPLS wg last call will end on April 12
>
> Could the authors please address the comments and publish
> a new version of the draft.
>
> Loa and George
>
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
> Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
>                                              +46 767 72 92 13
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-tp mailing list
> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
>