[mpls-tp] draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-03

zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn Mon, 28 February 2011 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C417A3A6961; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:33:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q9JuQv6RYP2F; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:33:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CD13A695E; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 205952043691617; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:28:59 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.20] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 47420.2043691617; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:24:55 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p1S1Xsf6038947; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:33:54 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn)
To: ccamp@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 3D2BCB7D:7BE0C902-48257845:00045755; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OF3D2BCB7D.7BE0C902-ON48257845.00045755-48257845.0008966A@zte.com.cn>
From: zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:34:00 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-02-28 09:33:53, Serialize complete at 2011-02-28 09:33:53
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0008966748257845_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn p1S1Xsf6038947
Subject: [mpls-tp] draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-03
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 01:33:13 -0000

Dear All

We just updated the document about the creating of associated 
bidirectional LSPs, and below is the link:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-03.txt


Compared with last version, the main changes are about the section of 
asymmetric associated bidirectional LSP:

We used the object UPSTREAM_TSPEC to trigger the peer end to set up the 
reverse unidirectional LSP in last version, however the application 
scenario defined in 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-01 is 
different from here. So a new object called REVERSE_TSPEC is used to 
replace the UPSTREAM_TSPCE object in this version.

The other revisions are structural and editoral in nature, such as 
complementing more considerations about security, adding one sub-section 
of informativereference, temporarily moving George from the position of 
co-authors....

The authors would like to have more feedback from the mailing list before 
pushing this work forward. 

Grateful if you could review the document and post comments on the mailing 
list.
 
Thanks and best regards
 
Fei