Re: [mpls-tp] liaison on the OAM defintion draft
Dan Frost <danfrost@cisco.com> Mon, 14 September 2009 15:40 UTC
Return-Path: <danfrost@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B813A682C for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEh2jNRE9nE8 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191093A6403 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEACcBrkpAZnmf/2dsb2JhbADFXIhMAY5FBYQY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,384,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="58023410"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2009 15:41:11 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8EFfB65014354; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:41:11 -0400
Received: from isolaria.cisco.com (isolaria.cisco.com [64.100.19.13]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8EFfB0S029268; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:41:11 GMT
Received: from isolaria.cisco.com (isolaria [127.0.0.1]) by isolaria.cisco.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8EFfB1s009271; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:41:11 -0400
Received: (from danfrost@localhost) by isolaria.cisco.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n8EFfBq8009270; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:41:11 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: isolaria.cisco.com: danfrost set sender to danfrost@cisco.com using -f
From: Dan Frost <danfrost@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4AAE5C57.6000504@pi.nu> (Loa Andersson's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:08:07 +0200")
References: <4AAE3E6C.2000907@pi.nu> <y1gmocpdmxj7.fsf@cisco.com> <4AAE5C57.6000504@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:41:11 +0100
Message-ID: <y1gmfxapmt48.fsf@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=614; t=1252942871; x=1253806871; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=danfrost@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dan=20Frost=20<danfrost@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[mpls-tp]=20liaison=20on=20the=20OAM=20 defintion=20draft |Sender:=20 |To:=20Loa=20Andersson=20<loa@pi.nu>; bh=2G9huN2Bmwo3ZNLL8R8/Io6bHa0PmkY9hgYimb9h0MY=; b=zNn6rCleBF9l+XNb4FNBNOI1rKEqcOGW3Un2MCg90f8WHdj3n7jZ8uN7Q6 l8hStgTGvSDjpjh/NL5hQokwhKQphgPrx22upA3iiLpa9AXcurzT9iVSEVDI bcyOgmYm3n;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=danfrost@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] liaison on the OAM defintion draft
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:40:29 -0000
Perfect. -d Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> writes: > Dan, > > thanks! I agree what about: > > "The ambivalence in the OAM acronym has been noted earlier, e.g. in > section 3 of RFC 5513 [RFC5513]." > > /Loa > > > Dan Frost wrote: >> Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> writes: >> >>> please note that the opsawg chair has sent a liaison to the SG15 and >>> Questions that >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-mpls-tp-oam-def-00 >>> >>> has been accepted as an opsawg document. >> >> A reference to RFC 5513 would seem to be highly appropriate here. >> >> :) >> >> -d >> >>> /Loa
- [mpls-tp] liaison on the OAM defintion draft Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls-tp] liaison on the OAM defintion draft Dan Frost
- Re: [mpls-tp] liaison on the OAM defintion draft Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls-tp] liaison on the OAM defintion draft Dan Frost