Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-04 last wg last call

Hi Ravi,

On Dec 12, 2006, at 9:46 AM, Raveendra Torvi wrote:

> Hi,
>  Is it assumed that  LSR counts both p2mp and p2p TE-LSPs?
> Should we count them separetely?
> IMO, counting them seperately might help as traffic characteristics  
> are different for unicast and multicast.
>

The TLVs report the number of TE LSPs (P2P and P2MP), no plan to have  
two separate TLVs.

Thanks.

JP.

> Thanks,
> Ravi.
>
> On 12/12/06, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> we have a small draft "draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-04"
> that is about ready to be sent to the IESG.
>
> The draft has been updated after working group last call (though
> we are aware of a couple of small editorial nits, e.g. repeated
> words in the title).
>
> This mails start a one week working last call to verify that
> all comments been addressed and that there are no outstanding
> issues, i.e. if you are happy with the draft you don't need
> to respond.
>
> Loa and George.
>
> --
> Loa Andersson
>
> Principal Networking Architect
> Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
> Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
> Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
>                                           loa@pi.se
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls