Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05.txt

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 24 November 2020 03:59 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3023A0DAE; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:59:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TRN7jlcYC4im; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:59:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5141C3A0DAC; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.14] (unknown [111.125.109.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D22F323990; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 04:59:24 +0100 (CET)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
References: <160550354375.21471.821763555405806681@ietfa.amsl.com> <01f501d6bbd7$70205c20$50611460$@olddog.co.uk> <056e01d6c1c9$dbad18f0$93074ad0$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <ddfbee0a-1610-a6e0-6122-ee894b43ba96@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:59:05 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <056e01d6c1c9$dbad18f0$93074ad0$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/-fw2D-iwuAY0YUJfc5dAGNW9EqE>
Subject: Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 03:59:32 -0000

Adrian, wg group

On 24/11/2020 02:52, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Just chasing up to see whether there is anything else the authors need to
> do.
> 

I'm fine with the document as it is.

> I think the next action, as noted in the chairs' slides from Bangkok, is
> with the chairs to do a working group last call specifically on the changes
> since -03.

Yes, Nic should start this wglc, the wg chairs talked about it. I think 
one week is enough.

/Loa
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 16 November 2020 05:15
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05.txt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As promised, this just catches a couple of nits from Loa.
> 
> I think the next action is with Nic, but would welcome any review comments
> or questions.
> 
> Adrian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: 16 November 2020 05:12
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: mpls@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG of the
> IETF.
> 
>          Title           : Special Purpose Label terminology
>          Authors         : Loa Andersson
>                            Kireeti Kompella
>                            Adrian Farrel
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05.txt
> 	Pages           : 8
> 	Date            : 2020-11-15
> 
> Abstract:
>     This document discusses and recommends a terminology that may be used
>     when MPLS Special Purpose Labels (SPL) are specified and documented.
> 
>     This document applies that terminology change to the relevant IANA
>     registry and also clarifies the use of the Entropy Label Indicator
>     (7) when immediately preceded by the Extension Label (15).
> 
>     This document updates RFC 7274 and RFC 3032.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64