Re: [mpls] "A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base" - draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-14
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 31 July 2020 14:00 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1F73A0BFC; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.216
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.267, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id avQseoioWf3F; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A34E3A0B53; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.100.94;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Acee Lindem (acee)'" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org
References: <4769F2D4-C3E9-4196-BAAB-AB2B64DA0C1F@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4769F2D4-C3E9-4196-BAAB-AB2B64DA0C1F@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:00:07 -0400
Message-ID: <01f901d66742$e61f9420$b25ebc60$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01FA_01D66721.5F0F53B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIIa2EBvh+gzie9YfBQBcJhJpOZhqi9rurg
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200730-4, 07/30/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/0urMLvgULBEAGs7HBNh0jMhZKnA>
Subject: Re: [mpls] "A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base" - draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-14
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:00:14 -0000
BGP model is starting WG LC. Sue From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 9:40 AM To: mpls@ietf.org Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [mpls] "A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base" - draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-14 Hi, Loa asked that I document the chain of dependencies of documents already on the RFC Queue that are dependent on the subject draft. It is that draft-ietf-bfd-yang <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-yang/> is dependent on this document. Drafts already on the RFC Queue that are dependent on draft-ietf-bfd-yang are draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg/> , draft-ietf-ospf-yang <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/> , and draft-ietf-pim-yang <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-yang/> . There are others that haven’t yet reached the RFC Queue including draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model/> . Hence, can we give this draft some prioritization?? I know I’ve requested this at prior IETF and hopefully I won’t have to do it again in November. I also looked at the -14 and it doesn’t appear to have any dependencies on other models or documents that have not yet completed. Thanks, Acee
- [mpls] "A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base" - draft-… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] "A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base" - dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [mpls] "A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base" - dr… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] "A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base" - dr… tom petch