Re: [mpls] Reserving extended special purpose labels

"Vivek Kumar" <kvivek@broadcom.com> Fri, 15 March 2013 04:55 UTC

Return-Path: <kvivek@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C232D21F91B0 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DfPK2FPfbGUo for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mms2.broadcom.com (mms2.broadcom.com [216.31.210.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A69121F91AE for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.16.192.232] by mms2.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.5)); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:51:01 -0700
X-Server-Uuid: 4500596E-606A-40F9-852D-14843D8201B2
Received: from SJEXCHCAS05.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.203.13) by SJEXCHHUB02.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.192.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.247.2; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:55:13 -0700
Received: from SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [fe80::3da7:665e:cc78:181f]) by SJEXCHCAS05.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:55:03 -0700
From: Vivek Kumar <kvivek@broadcom.com>
To: "kireeti.kompella@gmail.com" <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Reserving extended special purpose labels
Thread-Index: Ac4hOKlGDepwf9olSVyAPeVbCpouKg==
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 04:55:02 +0000
Message-ID: <3C086BA39C55B9418AE8FEA3F3EFDEC42AC5B2FE@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.16.203.100]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 7D5C773F3C02308184-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Reserving extended special purpose labels
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 04:55:21 -0000

Hi Kireeti,
   Just one clarification needed. Why not reserve label value in the range 0-15 in the extended label space ?

Regards,
Vivek
 

Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:48:55 -0400
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Reserving extended special purpose labels
Message-ID: <0B390473-1A62-48B5-B5CD-D727C5D96F28@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=us-ascii

Hi All,

In today's discussion, I noted the need to reserve (i.e., not allocate) some of the special purpose labels in the extended space. The primary reason to reserve special purpose label S is that an implementation interprets S independent of the preceding label; an example is the ELI. 

Please comment to the list or to an MPLS WG chair near you if you believe a label in the range 0-14 should be reserved in the extended special purpose label space. 

Thanks,
Kireeti