Re: [mpls] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-01.txt

Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com> Sat, 27 April 2013 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D937B21F9894 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5At-215RUa7e for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x234.google.com (mail-qa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0090921F988A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id hg5so465286qab.18 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=ftJKYWphVsT91MYG02lQmYQWm6DsthyOpOBjYaf9kXM=; b=T8DqVxlXzEPGj/Abz8zr6V8PGxS0RLjuZcIs94cPFKiEtUtmKXxaS7gVm3ASelCwoP UkTtBTuexDDZVi+f3Mvbvu7o+w8z2NogRx3aVtCpbuEdgxgfd/0D8cxXwGfXGQK5GYwP TJI20XnAEJ7WTabnlOKOz/3MEAtepaFAbOJDnQ7Sqiyf7RLjdasLav+JVazEEzPOClb/ rFOZf/3ogmxnb8ymtLPp/uP51LCkKNeOIpWVu0Uq1AQeqXAo43/WiS02H7rZYaLBL800 YHZKoN13xFYEoSFHUE/S2bnHDpPG7j3xFfxhbFe6OFIjfffsgDSRc5PFWoAjQoHuqJ54 00+A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.168.140 with SMTP id u12mr16725908qay.43.1367051230409; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.16.197 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:27:10 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH==cJwzLRHO3JErzX7sa-u7cpeFHBA7Nddtxo+ed=HfNFgTyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3074b684fa7c2c04db536a0d"
Subject: Re: [mpls] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:27:12 -0000

Hi all,
We update this draft to 01, and section 8 is a newly added part for failure
dection of HSMP LSP. We receive this comments from Pranjal, and thank
Pranjal again. Any more comments are welcome.

Regards
Lizhong

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:11 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Lizhong Jin and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:        draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp
> Revision:        01
> Title:           LDP Extensions for Hub & Spoke Multipoint Label Switched
> Path
> Creation date:   2013-04-18
> Group:           mpls
> Number of pages: 13
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-01.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-01
> Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-01
>
> Abstract:
>    This draft introduces a hub & spoke multipoint LSP (short for HSMP
>    LSP), which allows traffic both from root to leaf through P2MP LSP
>    and also leaf to root along the co-routed reverse path.  That means
>    traffic entering the HSMP LSP from application/customer at the root
>    node travels downstream, exactly as if it was traveling downstream
>    along a P2MP LSP to each leaf node, and traffic entering the HSMP LSP
>    at any leaf node travels upstream along the tree to the root as if it
>    is unicast to the root, except that it follows the path of the tree
>    rather than ordinary unicast to the root.
>
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>