IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6371 (3961)

"Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com> Sat, 12 April 2014 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EDF1A0180 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FucBwQcc3RYJ for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A76A1A0079 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=754; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1397280534; x=1398490134; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=L8i3KDC0gfzwE31UPKXQ92NjqQOHt8rmjYpT/zgfXWk=; b=AEV6+C0a4PNDRISLQVswmyldDt/jEH8YYyD18MtcLHLvUpDGIdN8z+Wf j0mHtfMvHTacxSDQRm25Hd8qRHn2kKnhBDRT3GoAuaFaaWTcp6iyEEsdw FgBEnTQaoWrAY1j4RykszWoOeDF97z6f1TAQd45M9ouK/efiO8oUeb2Pe I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoFAATOSFOtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABYgwasBJg0gRsWdIIlAQEBAwE6PwULAgEIGB0BEDIlAgQOBYd0CMtPF445MweDJIEUAQOYYJJCgzE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,847,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="35190381"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Apr 2014 05:28:54 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3C5SsD3003663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 12 Apr 2014 05:28:54 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.175]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 00:28:53 -0500
From: "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6371 (3961)
Thread-Index: AQHPVfhE5xGTT1AFAU2a2n+JwK/shZsNdD2b
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 05:28:52 +0000
Message-ID: <C2F278E1-91CE-4EA4-B542-7CEB64454F13@cisco.com>
References: <20140412023756.D96E418000D@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140412023756.D96E418000D@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/1NB1GHrCUzuLMXkUn74BYQXZWjA
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "Italo.Busi@alcatel-lucent.com" <Italo.Busi@alcatel-lucent.com>, "bestman0729@gmail.com" <bestman0729@gmail.com>, "rcallon@juniper.net" <rcallon@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6371 (3961)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 05:28:57 -0000

Better replacement text would be:

> This packet
>      will be delivered by the forwarding plane to all 
>      nodes at the same TTL distance as the target MIP and to any leaf
>      that is located at a shorter distance.

This is shorter than the proposed replacement text.

It works because all nodes is the union of all MIPs and all leaves at the TTL
distance.

Stewart

Sent from my iPad

> On 12 Apr 2014, at 03:38, "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> This packet
>      will be delivered by the forwarding plane to all intermediate
>      nodes at the same TTL distance of the target MIP and to any leaf
>      that is located at a shorter distance.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email