Re: [mpls] poll on draft-fang-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design

[Eric Gray <[e-mail]>]

I think the document is very useful, but have some concerns about
how the title/suject-matter fits into the long established norm
for RFCs published by the MPLS working group.

Looking it over, and discussing it with a few colleagues, it seems
to me that this would be a very useful working group document if it
were "MPLS-TP Applicability" or perhaps "MPLS-TP Applicability; Use
Cases and Design."

I would be interested in hearing from the authors what they might
feel about this...

--
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 1:35 PM
To: [e-mail]; MPLS-TP ad hoc team; [e-mail]; George Swallow; Ross Callon
Subject: [mpls] poll on draft-fang-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design

Working Group,

this is to start a two week poll to see if there is support to make
draft-fang-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design an mpls working group draft.

Pleased send your comments to the mpls working group mailing list
([e-mail]).

This poll ends Tue Nov 15.

/Loa
for the mpls wg chairs
-- 


Loa Andersson                         email: [e-mail]
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            [e-mail]
Ericsson Inc                          phone: [phone]
                                              [phone]
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls