Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard
John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Wed, 02 June 2010 13:00 UTC
Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68CF3A6826; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.351, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QIlracVUWJT7; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og123.obsmtp.com (exprod7og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F073A67F0; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob123.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTAZVuT5RzWWNLCdFoFxR76Ve4+Jzv5ic@postini.com; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:59:47 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:55:57 -0700
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:55:55 -0700
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AcsCUE0Kc37nFAnuSvaTRMQsyLtixQAAkw/g
Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163983B430EAE@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <OF4604D95B.49A74E84-ON48257736.0004B89C-48257736.00050949@zte.com.cn> <4C064A18.1050003@cisco.com> <4C06504A.6090606@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4C06504A.6090606@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:00:01 -0000
Loa, I'm sorry, that's right. There is only one label stack entry per stack in which the 'S' bit is set. Thanks, John > -----Original Message----- > From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Loa Andersson > Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 5:36 AM > To: stbryant@cisco.com > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; IETF-Announce; mpls-tp@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane > (MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard > > All, > > a label stack consists of one or more label stack entries, there is one > s bit in each of the label stack entries, only one of the s bits are set > (indicating that this is the bottom of the label stack) > > /Loa > > On 2010-06-02 14:10, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > Liu > > > > As John says, there is only one s bit in a label stack. > > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of > >> > liu.guoman@zte.com.cn > >> > Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 11:37 PM > >> > To: mpls-tp@ietf.org > >> > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-bounces@ietf.org; IETF-Announce; > >> mpls-tp@ietf.org > >> > Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS > >> > Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard > >> > > >> > > >> > hi,all editors > >> > About section 3.2 , there is the following paragraph: > >> > " If the section is an LSP, this information MAY be implied by > >> > the LSP label or, if the LSP payload is MPLS-labeled, by the setting > >> > of the S bit. Additional labels MAY also be used if necessary to > >> > distinguish different payload types" > >> > IMO, if the client traffic of section layer is MPLS-labeled, the S > >> bit of > >> > section label must be set 1. > > > > Please look at Fig 2 of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework. > > > > The section would add an additional label at the bottom of the stacks > > shown in the figure. > > > > A payload indicator label would be the label below the dashed line, and > > the LSP and section labels would be below that in the figure. > > > > However only one S bit is set in the stack. > > > > > >> > if my understanding is true, maybe violate MPLS-TP framework? > >> > in my memory,only S bit of the lowest label should be set 1 in MPLS > >> Label > >> > stack, > >> > there can be only one S-bit set in a label stack. > >> > > >> > maybe i misunderstand the sentence? I hope it can clarify this > paragragh > >> > clearly. > > I do not think that any further clarification is needed in the dataplane > > text. > > > > - Stewart > > > > > >> > > >> > best regards > >> > liu > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> > >> > 发件人: mpls-bounces@ietf.org > >> > > >> > 2010-06-01 06:27 > >> > 请答复 给 > >> > ietf@ietf.org > >> > > >> > 收件人 > >> > IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> > >> > 抄送 > >> > mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org > >> > 主题 > >> > [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS Transport > >> > Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label > >> Switching WG > >> > (mpls) to consider the following document: > >> > > >> > - 'MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture ' > >> > <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane-03.txt> as a Proposed Standard > >> > > >> > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > >> > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to > the > >> > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-06-14. Exceptionally, > >> > comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please > >> > retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > >> > > >> > The file can be obtained via > >> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane- > 03.txt > >> > > >> > IESG discussion can be tracked via > >> > > >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=19 > >> > 671&rfc_flag=0 > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > mpls mailing list > >> > mpls@ietf.org > >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -------------------------------------------------------- > >> > ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this > >> mail is > >> > solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication > is > >> > confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain > >> secrecy and > >> > are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to > >> > others. > >> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > >> intended > >> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > >> addressed. > >> > If you have received this email in error please notify the originator > of > >> > the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the > >> > individual sender. > >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam > >> > system. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> mpls mailing list > >> mpls@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > >> > >> > >> -------------------------------------------------------- > >> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in > this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This > mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are > obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose > the contents of this communication to others. > >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential > and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in > error please notify the originator of the message. Any views > expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE > Anti-Spam system. > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> mpls mailing list > >> mpls@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > >> > > > > > > -- > > For corporate legal information go to: > > > > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls mailing list > > mpls@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > -- > > > Loa Andersson email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu > Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 > +46 767 72 92 13 > _______________________________________________ > mpls-tp mailing list > mpls-tp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
- [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (… The IESG
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-pla… liu.guoman
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-pla… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-pla… liu.guoman
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-pla… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-pla… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-t… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-pla… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-t… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-t… Eric Gray
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-t… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-t… liu.guoman
- Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-t… Curtis Villamizar