Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Wed, 02 June 2010 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68CF3A6826; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.351, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QIlracVUWJT7; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og123.obsmtp.com (exprod7og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F073A67F0; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob123.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTAZVuT5RzWWNLCdFoFxR76Ve4+Jzv5ic@postini.com; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:59:47 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:55:57 -0700
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:55:55 -0700
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AcsCUE0Kc37nFAnuSvaTRMQsyLtixQAAkw/g
Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163983B430EAE@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <OF4604D95B.49A74E84-ON48257736.0004B89C-48257736.00050949@zte.com.cn> <4C064A18.1050003@cisco.com> <4C06504A.6090606@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4C06504A.6090606@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:00:01 -0000

Loa,

I'm sorry, that's right.  There is only one label stack entry per stack in which the 'S' bit is set.

Thanks,

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 5:36 AM
> To: stbryant@cisco.com
> Cc: mpls@ietf.org; IETF-Announce; mpls-tp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane
> (MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard
> 
> All,
> 
> a label stack consists of one or more label stack entries, there is one
> s bit in each of the label stack entries, only one of the s bits are set
> (indicating that this is the bottom of the label stack)
> 
> /Loa
> 
> On 2010-06-02 14:10, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> > Liu
> >
> > As John says, there is only one s bit in a label stack.
> >
> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of
> >> > liu.guoman@zte.com.cn
> >> > Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 11:37 PM
> >> > To: mpls-tp@ietf.org
> >> > Cc: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-bounces@ietf.org; IETF-Announce;
> >> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS
> >> > Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > hi,all editors
> >> > About section 3.2 , there is the following paragraph:
> >> > " If the section is an LSP, this information MAY be implied by
> >> > the LSP label or, if the LSP payload is MPLS-labeled, by the setting
> >> > of the S bit. Additional labels MAY also be used if necessary to
> >> > distinguish different payload types"
> >> > IMO, if the client traffic of section layer is MPLS-labeled, the S
> >> bit of
> >> > section label must be set 1.
> >
> > Please look at Fig 2 of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework.
> >
> > The section would add an additional label at the bottom of the stacks
> > shown in the figure.
> >
> > A payload indicator label would be the label below the dashed line, and
> > the LSP and section labels would be below that in the figure.
> >
> > However only one S bit is set in the stack.
> >
> >
> >> > if my understanding is true, maybe violate MPLS-TP framework?
> >> > in my memory,only S bit of the lowest label should be set 1 in MPLS
> >> Label
> >> > stack,
> >> > there can be only one S-bit set in a label stack.
> >> >
> >> > maybe i misunderstand the sentence? I hope it can clarify this
> paragragh
> >> > clearly.
> > I do not think that any further clarification is needed in the dataplane
> > text.
> >
> > - Stewart
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> > best regards
> >> > liu
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> >> > 发件人: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
> >> >
> >> > 2010-06-01 06:27
> >> > 请答复 给
> >> > ietf@ietf.org
> >> >
> >> > 收件人
> >> > IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> >> > 抄送
> >> > mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org
> >> > 主题
> >> > [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane (MPLS Transport
> >> > Profile Data Plane Architecture) to Proposed Standard
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label
> >> Switching WG
> >> > (mpls) to consider the following document:
> >> >
> >> > - 'MPLS Transport Profile Data Plane Architecture '
> >> > <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane-03.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> >> >
> >> > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> >> > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to
> the
> >> > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-06-14. Exceptionally,
> >> > comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please
> >> > retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> >> >
> >> > The file can be obtained via
> >> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane-
> 03.txt
> >> >
> >> > IESG discussion can be tracked via
> >> >
> >>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=19
> >> > 671&rfc_flag=0
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > mpls mailing list
> >> > mpls@ietf.org
> >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --------------------------------------------------------
> >> > ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this
> >> mail is
> >> > solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication
> is
> >> > confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain
> >> secrecy and
> >> > are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to
> >> > others.
> >> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> >> intended
> >> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> >> addressed.
> >> > If you have received this email in error please notify the originator
> of
> >> > the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
> >> > individual sender.
> >> > This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam
> >> > system.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpls mailing list
> >> mpls@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> >>
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------
> >> ZTE  Information  Security  Notice:  The  information  contained  in
> this  mail  is  solely  property  of  the  sender's  organization.  This
> mail  communication  is  confidential.  Recipients  named  above  are
> obligated  to  maintain  secrecy  and  are  not  permitted  to  disclose
> the  contents  of  this  communication  to  others.
> >> This  email  and  any  files  transmitted  with  it  are  confidential
> and  intended  solely  for  the  use  of  the  individual  or  entity  to
> whom  they  are  addressed.  If  you  have  received  this  email  in
> error  please  notify  the  originator  of  the  message.  Any  views
> expressed  in  this  message  are  those  of  the  individual  sender.
> >> This  message  has  been  scanned  for  viruses  and  Spam  by  ZTE
> Anti-Spam  system.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpls mailing list
> >> mpls@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > For corporate legal information go to:
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
> Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
>                                               +46 767 72 92 13
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-tp mailing list
> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp