[mpls] Shepherd comment on draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 11 December 2015 01:02 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FA51B3317; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:02:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kVECaIK_zRiH; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F6B1B3315; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:02:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.5.6.111] (unknown [111.207.233.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5CD318013CB; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 02:02:09 +0100 (CET)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org" <draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <566A208A.3020800@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:02:02 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/3WY07qC4h5dJ9qaiCZaHz7gtF00>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Shepherd comment on draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:02:15 -0000
Working Group, authors, mpls-rt reviewers First, thanks everyone for all the good work, all the useful comments and resolution of these comments. Second, there is a discussion (comment resolution) on what need/should be done before vs. after the wg adoption poll the wg chairs has discussed this off-line. We said to two things 1. Much of the comment resolution (and some of the reviews) has not been done on the wg mailing list. This has now been posted to the list. 2. We agree that a lot of this work only make sense to do if the document is a wg doc. However see the third bullet below. Third, the document is almost ready for the working group adoption poll. We agree with Kireeti that: "a) the deprecations (esp DSMAP) (including moving these into an appendix) be dealt with before making this a WG doc;" Forth, as soon as this is done and the new version posted, we will start the adoption poll. /Loa mpls wg co-chair PS Sorry for the delays, I've been traveling -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] Shepherd comment on draft-smack-mpls-rfc43… Loa Andersson