[mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt-06: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 13 September 2017 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7D6132ECB; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt@ietf.org, tsaad@cisco.com, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu, mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.61.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150532856962.30505.5556259079704360665.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:49:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/4HrY7kW5lMXeL3n-3-J6H7LR_eI>
Subject: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:49:30 -0000

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mrt/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) I think that Section 4.4. (Interaction of MRT-related LDP advertisements
with the MRT topology and computations) would benefit from a reference to
rfc5443 (LDP IGP Synchronization).

(2) From Section 5: "The associated LSPs must be created before a failure
occurs..."  Should that be a Normative MUST?