IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)

"George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com> Tue, 07 April 2015 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <swallow@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 8E7F01B379A; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713351B3768 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqwZ0wivt3ei for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD7B71A897D for <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com ([173.37.142.89]:27034) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_128_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <swallow@cisco.com>) id 1YfWC7-0002nr-FY for draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:17:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1012; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1428423465; x=1429633065; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=DWVyhyXvob9Vg3wwGHYH85PO9K2kzncacQ+qcy3cDaI=; b=E2WPES8MZIkILl9pQGxYYw2Uvmc6IcCDLYm6zDomxl/yqxj5QF2UWagW ilqFOFc2yg5kd/ahG43R8JcypEku9PwR2aCgsbVddM/gg/UfSWOeYB1TB 7vn3lyMDbx6gQYdy8W/T51AfHiNXqRACDR2WEzkvVTxPe7Cwq7Jopiasx M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BxBQAjAiRV/5RdJa1cgwhSXAXFRoV9AoEuTAEBAQEBAX6EHwEBBDo/EAIBCDYFCzIlAgQOBQmIIQ3MXQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGIsrgT2DPweELQWQdIoHgR2DN4cKiH0ighAjgTxvgUR/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,538,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="139038977"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2015 16:17:38 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t37GHasO024391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 16:17:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.175]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:17:35 -0500
From: "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com>
To: "drafts-approval@iana.org" <drafts-approval@iana.org>
Thread-Topic: [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHQblrexkyhSfFeI0Om81lN8J54uZ1B0MCA
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:17:34 +0000
Message-ID: <D1497A6D.10EB81%swallow@cisco.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-815506@icann.org> <20150325222459.19546.84118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-28999-1428098944-1488.815506-7-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.2.9-28999-1428098944-1488.815506-7-0@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.98.56.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C1F32CCC0A0EF04DB0C3D60521C884A6@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.37.142.89
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: swallow@cisco.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150407161744.CD7B71A897D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 09:17:44 -0700
Resent-From: swallow@cisco.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools/PxK888yyidyMKyb5SpqzgqQj1T8>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/5uZ22LLEvL5eKPF6DUl7ZdtYSAk>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:17:46 -0000

Amanda -

Please assign all four from the 0-16383 range.

Thanks,

George

On 4/3/15 6:09 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-approval@iana.org> wrote:

>Dear Authors,
>
>We have two questions about the assignments requested by this document:
>
>1) Which range should be used for the TLV registrations?
>
>0-16383	Standards Action (This range is for mandatory TLVs or for
>optional TLVs that require an error message if not recognized.)
>16384-31743	Specification Required (Experimental RFC needed)
>32768-49161	Standards Action (This range is for optional TLVs that can be
>silently dropped if not recognized.)
>49162-64511	Specification Required (Experimental RFC needed)
>
>2) Can you confirm that we should make the Message Types assignment from
>the Standards Action range (0-191) , rather than the Specification
>Required range (192-255)?
>
>Please see
>http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters
>
>thanks,
>
>Amanda Baber
>IANA Request Specialist
>ICANN
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email