IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)

"George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com> Wed, 08 April 2015 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <swallow@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 85B451B313D; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 07:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663F71B313B for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 07:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqw--PDuW0yq for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 07:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA0461B3133 for <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 07:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com ([173.37.142.90]:17167) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_128_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <swallow@cisco.com>) id 1Yfr0h-0006rc-6S for draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 07:31:20 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1740; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1428503479; x=1429713079; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=N0FaHlkzUEvB3ITXoH3mgMwllSG7QlssheV7YiJoUBo=; b=PSPMUlcJ1f6MaChNauv2zO0lqhyLcWo/FKWhZCnQtu1k/3cF2vuJuT/G swN0qkz0DSXNm2GZYWgf9lRKdO82AwNuyXwIg/aw9g/0Hp1ksLRt5MG+u NXnrdpAaanEpYfL/uYfMb1/jWuCDl5zy6OpYdkHmrO4AVqKaAAlSZiHpr 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BRBAABOyVV/51dJa1cgwhSXAXDZwmBSAqFfQKBKDgUAQEBAQEBAX2EIAEBBAEBATcxAwsOAgIBCBgeBQsbDAslAgQBDQUJiCENzB4BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBIsngT2CXBEBUQeELQWQdIoHgR2DN4cKiH0ighAjgTxvgQs5fwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,544,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="139320052"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2015 14:31:12 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t38EVCSc028287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:31:12 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.175]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([173.37.183.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:31:12 -0500
From: "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "drafts-approval@iana.org" <drafts-approval@iana.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHQblrexkyhSfFeI0Om81lN8J54uZ1B0MCAgAGWbAD//94tAA==
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:31:12 +0000
Message-ID: <D14AB3A7.10EC33%swallow@cisco.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-815506@icann.org> <20150325222459.19546.84118.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-28999-1428098944-1488.815506-7-0@icann.org> <D1497A6D.10EB81%swallow@cisco.com> <55251FCA.90506@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <55251FCA.90506@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.98.56.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <0C7D51CB5CA3424EB9BD8062BD67049C@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.37.142.90
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: swallow@cisco.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150408143120.CA0461B3133@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 07:31:20 -0700
Resent-From: swallow@cisco.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools/ZI70JqopH2npyKbjp6Q9WXd5NBk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/pdenSQftIm1aLgFPZ4O9PwfC20w>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [IANA #815506] Protocol Action: 'Proxy MPLS Echo Request' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-05.txt)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:31:22 -0000

The message type should be assigned from "standards action".

George

On 4/8/15 8:32 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

>George,
>
>That is fine for the TLVs, what about the message types?
>
>/Loa
>
>On 2015-04-07 18:17, George Swallow (swallow) wrote:
>> Amanda -
>>
>> Please assign all four from the 0-16383 range.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> George
>>
>> On 4/3/15 6:09 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-approval@iana.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Authors,
>>>
>>> We have two questions about the assignments requested by this document:
>>>
>>> 1) Which range should be used for the TLV registrations?
>>>
>>> 0-16383	Standards Action (This range is for mandatory TLVs or for
>>> optional TLVs that require an error message if not recognized.)
>>> 16384-31743	Specification Required (Experimental RFC needed)
>>> 32768-49161	Standards Action (This range is for optional TLVs that can
>>>be
>>> silently dropped if not recognized.)
>>> 49162-64511	Specification Required (Experimental RFC needed)
>>>
>>> 2) Can you confirm that we should make the Message Types assignment
>>>from
>>> the Standards Action range (0-191) , rather than the Specification
>>> Required range (192-255)?
>>>
>>> Please see
>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-lsp-ping-parameters
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Amanda Baber
>>> IANA Request Specialist
>>> ICANN
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
>-- 
>
>
>Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email