[mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr-18 telechat Tsvart review
Brian Trammell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 03 February 2026 07:09 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.6.212] (unknown [4.156.85.76]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFFFB104B99; Mon, 2 Feb 2026 23:09:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Trammell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.58.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <177010258056.631.7318993057139063675@dt-datatracker-6bcfd44575-g5gjh>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 23:09:40 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: 4FBEBKXKUBZMVRWMVUW3X4ABCBECYR34
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4FBEBKXKUBZMVRWMVUW3X4ABCBECYR34
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
Subject: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr-18 telechat Tsvart review
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/69L0OEgyopm_LzBvTBz_CpyTWt0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>
Document: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr Title: MPLS Network Action (MNA) Sub-Stack Specification including In-Stack Network Actions and Data Reviewer: Brian Trammell Review result: Ready with Issues This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. Thank you for the revised version of this document; the edits seem mostly editorial but appear to point at clarifying my first concern. I'll defer to the routing reviewers as to whether MNA/ECMP interactions remain an issue. I'm a little perplexed that the secdir review marked a doc ready where the security concept is "we trust the IETF to only define secure usages of this extension"; however, if the Security ADs are OK with this then I guess I am too.
- [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr-18 telechat Tsvart⦠Brian Trammell via Datatracker