Re: [mpls] [spring] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <> Wed, 22 July 2015 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F751B3356; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9zimK6FLDKhn; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 561FB1A1A9B; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=1906; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437571364; x=1438780964; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=uCCYNb5K22k7ei/zURm/Cd9HB20cfLjkZjW2A4sSMpY=; b=ESFFu0Z2QIEpYow0jQgjclmFs9vSZ/aWCgeXO74nPNiM+Qr5dOaSqHib b0EsCmDJPw4hqKOBidIvcm5rId+CnaRLxHVw5n5wl/3iOXC0cyDRPrOw2 eOrWpccFHUgvYyAcLtUOONYaFIQUSjA+46dAHNEwT3AQIZQ8Rf+mXChLL k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,523,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="171126680"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2015 13:22:43 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6MDMh1M031697 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:22:43 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:22:43 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <>
To: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [spring] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop
Thread-Index: AQHQxIDU8ERkTDnIVUehkvPQ7OrIQJ3n704A
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:22:43 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:22:46 -0000

I support WG adoption as there is a strong requirement for

On 7/22/15, 3:17 PM, "spring on behalf of John G.Scudder"
< on behalf of> wrote:

>Dear WG,
>As we discussed at our meeting yesterday, working group adoption has been
>requested for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop. Please
>reply to the list with your comments, including although not limited to
>whether or not you support adoption. Non-authors are especially
>encouraged to comment.
>In consideration of the fact that a number of WG calls are going on
>concurrently, we will end the call on August 31, 2015.
>Authors, please indicate whether you are aware of any relevant IPR and if
>so, whether it has been disclosed. Also, the length of the author list
>for this document greatly exceeds the maximum recommended. Assuming the
>document is adopted, the authors should be prepared to correct this when
>submitting as a WG document, ideally by reducing the list to simply the
>active editor(s) and making use of the "contributors" section for the
>full list.
>--Bruno and John
>P.S.: Cc MPLS owing to the LDP connection. Please respect the reply-to.
>spring mailing list