Re: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-05: (with COMMENT)

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Mon, 04 March 2019 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B5C131084; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 13:58:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZPzMDW0agh4H; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 13:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x844.google.com (mail-qt1-x844.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::844]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D6C1310EE; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 13:58:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x844.google.com with SMTP id w4so6880972qtc.1; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 13:58:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y/gLnnO1LNugmpSUybaispSrpy5zQKRLUaEMfPDRRgo=; b=ugGqYX0SUhSD9LCA0svFWJYirnIsoaQYbf+35sB608OsA397qQgiQOdd35lIZm+1dp q8tMK8wMhmrBlavNuxx6awXlcVKl0YNR84//rIRhLgqObIRBys8hYUPeqy5IUlzsmi11 eUCeQbPEjsLhtFugxnm8gC6g3nJcSG+Z4JBd35xbV2mV5aDBUkftvCtYPvahiHaZ/78W nuZFvOhNpQv+RzUG3i4gx8pXBKVJAk1pw07/KZ/oQNniVJFDCbJCYNEUogZbWxc6Feeb 2ZlPzxLfCVBvESnoIEQ4i4CNY3D+nuC7LKJE8IaNBT44sXshKVRcjMJZmamd3XkDKx6B 6ggQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y/gLnnO1LNugmpSUybaispSrpy5zQKRLUaEMfPDRRgo=; b=nwW5sdavSo70AcHYDFNSuXIxLls3Fqk3qbvJz0ESLfTfFNKzvp973AQmwQXvQ1uJbs 7NV0PDNeDO1691DxUO4RSrccpRekUjhR/pCH7Xgl1sDfu5K3ZI1CKzI2Z5MPTaagJLSY LI75dMdm16eWXtZUg64+Dpl7L03NdKYcgf0KrEANWPzFdm62/ZlLV7uHUW0uCbvQYsxJ 6t+9QV1wuewg4eFV8dBizL3LWZsDlk2SHs4d/34065F6mkuUdlvFseH0HJpr0PJVNrqO 3EUj1LZq67bEFtSCsZNtgkHqt9zzqtAf3lU/uwZbRigXQvfZ2Rra5SrPlTR52LwqI0wS 9zMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUNEJyu0jBdA7AqL7n+0HAv84TLB9+IwFSynKo1Ebximeg83mJy XF7uB1JutZStqitAtDUR9sWD5AxcmOL8FUt8wcgKYQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw45g3dXyHlQrxpq8fdMmDVBkaT5+knZIJ0JGBunNxo+fUWUov/LvxBunOeKJTcCY+kG9ZlxojGul82kU6j67s=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:32ef:: with SMTP id a44mr16476863qtb.334.1551736695758; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 13:58:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155173336630.5245.15422916059733100748.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155173336630.5245.15422916059733100748.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:58:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0D4_npqzF08eyfxCxY+hg7TyTXEK6EZOcEnDOQi47gXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-sfc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000089253405834bdacc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/6k-PDBBEK6kfkTfJxeDyP3G1LJE>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 21:58:20 -0000

Alvaro,

Per-packet metadata is also missing NSH functionality, and that is already
pointed out in section 12.

Cheers,
Andy


On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:02 PM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-sfc/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you for a very clear document!
>
> I think that the only NSH functionality not included in this document is
> the O
> bit (OAM packet).  I know that, even in rfc8300, the operation (beyond
> setting
> the bit) is not defined...and that work is still in progress in the SFC
> WG.
> However, given that this document describes a "logical representation of
> the
> NSH", I think it is necessary to point out why the coverage is not
> complete.
> In looking through the mail archive, I like the thoughts posted by one of
> the
> authors [1] and would like to see something like that reflected in the
> document.
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/b9Duw-9ShdCrIRyis3TOJWw-_pw
>
> nits:
>
> s/(as described in Section 4.1/(as described in Section 4.1)
>
> s/(see [I-D.ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane]/(see
> [I-D.ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane])
>
> s/TC:  The TC bits have no meaning./TC:  The TC bits have no meaning in
> this
> case.
>
> s/to determine to which SFF or instance of an SF (an SFI) to deliver the
> packet./to determine which SFF or instance of an SF (an SFI) to deliver the
> packet to.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>