[mpls] 答复: Correction - IPR Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp

[Quintin zhao <[e-mail]>]

Loa,

I am not aware of any IPRs other than the one already disclosed.

Regards,
Quintin

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Loa Andersson [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2014年7月11日 14:25
收件人: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Martin Vigoureux; [e-mail]
主题: Correction - IPR Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp

Working group,

I made a "copy - paste" mistake when I started this IPR poll. The correct text should be:

The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp has told the wg chairs that it is time to start the working group last call on this draft.

We will do so shortly, we will start the IPR poll first and follow up with the wglc.

This mail starts that IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm- over-mldp?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Currently there are one IPR disclosures that relates to this document.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks, Loa
(as MPLS WG co-chair)


On 2014-07-11 19:09, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp has told the wg chairs 
> that it is time to start the working group last call on this draft.
>
> We will do so shortly, we will start the IPR poll first and follow up 
> with the wglc.
>
> This mail starts that IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node- 
> protection?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> Currently there are two IPR disclosures that relates to this document.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond 
> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing 
> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a 
> response has been received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author 
> or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware 
> of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thanks, Loa
> (as MPLS WG co-chair)
>