IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 20 January 2021 08:08 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9E63A0C3B; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:08:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8oegk-pb7GK; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B693A0C35; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:08:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2a.google.com with SMTP id s2so12607835vsk.2; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:08:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OGtkCXiiJ5kRK273gpBpYkyE0TSHLblFY/BPb9O/wL8=; b=sN29HyHXAEltUheKke4dffl+QdUROMiNehL+Wj2/ZEWdg4Hul1+twpRkooLA8v5bGE w8L2NXRJ5Hj8t4vMxM4YTs1RDgUO0yPLqUF1T5Jrj3zlVxYYvv/n2gffW54PKVTIv08y 4ZHQWZShrhNml28wa/0ajjmuahb41JnQ/IrtBqQqVMOgid59IayxgA+xRTO7ZwH7xfwl LuYC7OIkjXr1xWc+xjunan/X9ftK0BKgu6g4vbeGvZcHpMEMUynUsLnOOYOjTrjB3VEh 2A7zU9kUBi13RUBBnRK0UMeYEgNAF8yfZBj0nsVxzhmk9cL1tTKY2d1Asl2c4vfo3GAM AHXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OGtkCXiiJ5kRK273gpBpYkyE0TSHLblFY/BPb9O/wL8=; b=eIRTBsyEPYmfAjdqO/f69DHSc394g/2u0YYVepnUlP7FUWqPQSdczAGFjKn32SH9oP xbASIsSVOFRpB9qTlP7ztpj67y7NgUqliw5XUyk/ZJ5MrDjhUhohgkCrPgBS3b+QxnzQ Puo0oU48CpbVK6MvJU3X24yVC2yraqMnGn/EKdNiD64wo1rMI6tiRtyQrD+jED6UYCZW V0SE/MmFYZ8xa+BiR3exzsUSHsWJVCmc/lPg/iWx87AQkOdIbluQtKWmyOOfGUHBxmnR ImZI7pfQOvWooRNM3GeBlO+CSjGogBk9RM9lqPlxjHgiEZrO07gj8arD5mmLiOkE8nd+ Vu5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kzNsb6t0weGegc/0K2u9+ZcYp+Gy85q6daIfr0VZEmbjKrJ6H GpmKFbvRE5lG6oZjo2QGu9QdWDFJXjDIHhOCgro=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLqC2oB7IM2yhEWgkTCZuCIpJJuRyDd4hJd4aMlRc3XacYWNisBNm7JRRfRDvyDF8v8WD5ar872rC4ZymvY3s=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:fb46:: with SMTP id e6mr5634885vsr.40.1611130111238; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:08:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+kPCafRv31p+ppo-F+gWnmwzzMcP6TS92WShdD7yJyTA@mail.gmail.com> <70AEE42E-BCB0-4F25-9145-0E76CC85DFD1@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <70AEE42E-BCB0-4F25-9145-0E76CC85DFD1@gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:08:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaLYKLtsvLhdssgv+sVG+RbzdttcxWPn+6vdD+3n79gwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, mpls@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7a7cb05b950753f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/9FCD-7VKKXb3pT5ZFyTuTBIbHzI>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:08:35 -0000

Yes, thanks.  I think this is just the first time I've run into this, so I
wanted to check.

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:59 PM Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Murray,
>
> Can we consider the comment responded to?
>
> /Loa
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 19 Jan 2021, at 21:33, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> >
> > 
> >>
> >> Can an IANA registry be a normative reference?  There are three here.
> >
> > Why not?  It's not typical, but if understanding the contents of the
> > registry is important to understanding this document, then it seems to
> > qualify.  And it's certainly a stable reference.
> >
> > I guess the only concern would be that the content of the registry can
> > (is actually expected to) change, but it's also the case that this
> > document would be best served by referring to the current content of
> > the registry at the time of reading, rather than having it fixed at
> > the time if publication.  So it seems to work there as well.
> >
> > All boxes ticked for me.
> >
> > Barry
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email