IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] R: FW: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 07 October 2011 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B5021F8BB6; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c3RYgGl-ujrT; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBE021F8BB0; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1RCHO6-000130-8Y; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:51:22 +0000
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 05:51:20 +0900
Message-ID: <m2aa9cy187.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD5223D575ED@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <1317815466.64710.YahooMailClassic@web15608.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> <OF6F3B1B56.62A7E34F-ON48257920.004BCE49-48257920.0051CF5E@zte.com.cn> <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD5223D56BC2@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <791AD3077F94194BB2BDD13565B6295D1D0A26C4@DAPHNIS.office.hd> <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD5223D575ED@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:02:27 -0700
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] R: FW: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:48:14 -0000

> IMO it is a statement of principle going forward. As such it does not
> "fix" or "make go away" the current situation, but it would be an IETF
> consensus position on a way forward. And I agree with that position.
> 
> Lots of folks do proprietary deployments, squat on code points
> etc. That cannot be "fixed" either, but I do not believe in rewarding
> it.

or aiding or abetting it.

+1

randy

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status