[mpls] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-16: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(Revised ballot)
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS feedback.

** For the responsible AD and WG chairs: I observe that this document doesn’t
fit neatly into the work items described in the “The current WG focus areas and
work items” section of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-mpls/07/

** Section 6.
   How the ingress node knows the FLC and FRLD of all
   the on-path nodes is outside the scope of this document.  However,
   [I-D.xzc-lsr-mpls-flc-frld] provides a method to achieve this.

Why make a reference to an expired, individual submission if the methodology is
out of scope?