[mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3031 (5002)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 21 April 2017 08:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50070129476 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IVmh_tNnYiz8 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E770E129420 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6821DB81257; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: erosen@cisco.com, arun@force10networks.com, rcallon@juniper.net, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, swallow.ietf@gmail.com, loa@pi.nu, n.leymann@telekom.de
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: eric.gray@ericsson.com, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20170421083955.6821DB81257@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/BN_N_uW4TlQkTWDZ3o-uj_8KjDQ>
Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3031 (5002)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:40:14 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3031,
"Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Editorial
Reported by: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>

Section: 3.8

Original Text
   Liberal label retention mode allows for quicker adaptation to routing
   changes, but conservative label retention mode though requires an LSR
   to maintain many fewer labels.

Corrected Text
   Liberal label retention mode allows for quicker adaptation to routing
   changes, while conservative label retention mode requires an LSR to
   maintain many fewer labels.

Grammar error in original text, which may make it harder for some to read and understand.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC3031 (draft-ietf-mpls-arch-06)
Title               : Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture
Publication Date    : January 2001
Author(s)           : E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. Callon
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG