[mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3031 (5002)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 21 April 2017 08:40 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50070129476 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IVmh_tNnYiz8 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E770E129420 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6821DB81257; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: erosen@cisco.com, arun@force10networks.com, rcallon@juniper.net, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, swallow.ietf@gmail.com, loa@pi.nu, n.leymann@telekom.de
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: eric.gray@ericsson.com, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170421083955.6821DB81257@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:39:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/BN_N_uW4TlQkTWDZ3o-uj_8KjDQ>
Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3031 (5002)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:40:14 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3031, "Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3031&eid=5002 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com> Section: 3.8 Original Text ------------- Liberal label retention mode allows for quicker adaptation to routing changes, but conservative label retention mode though requires an LSR to maintain many fewer labels. Corrected Text -------------- Liberal label retention mode allows for quicker adaptation to routing changes, while conservative label retention mode requires an LSR to maintain many fewer labels. Notes ----- Grammar error in original text, which may make it harder for some to read and understand. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC3031 (draft-ietf-mpls-arch-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture Publication Date : January 2001 Author(s) : E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. Callon Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3031 (5002) RFC Errata System