Re: [mpls] [PWE3] Multiple RSVP paths

Yong Lucy <lucyyong@huawei.com> Thu, 08 July 2010 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <lucyyong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9533A6968; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 15:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tMKIenCuDihh; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 15:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9717C3A6948; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 15:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L5900L4ZF5BBC@szxga04-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:15:11 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L59004FHF5BGK@szxga04-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:15:11 +0800 (CST)
Received: from y736742 ([10.124.12.56]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L5900HI9F58IJ@szxml04-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:15:11 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:15:08 -0500
From: Yong Lucy <lucyyong@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB3331639843877BA7@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
To: 'John E Drake' <jdrake@juniper.net>, curtis@occnc.com, stbryant@cisco.com
Message-id: <00fb01cb1eeb$08036860$380c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AcsdICeLrK/RZfGiTIyQXS2B8tj2VgABXQWwAG+wX9A=
References: "Your message of Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:07:21 BST." <4C31E719.1060402@cisco.com> <201007061530.o66FU4Q6007184@harbor.orleans.occnc.com> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB3331639843877BA7@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Cc: draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw@tools.ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, 'pwe3' <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] Multiple RSVP paths
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:15:22 -0000

Hi John,

It is not clear to me 

1) how the proposed solution works in Figure 1 situation of the draft. Even
the receiver B assigns the same label for all five sub-LSPs, because there
are intermediate nodes between A and B, the sender A will be asked to use
the different labels for five sub-LSPs, is that right?  

2) For the following MLSP case, do sub-LSPs start from node A or from node
W?

                                        
                           --L--   --P-- 
                          /     \ /     \
                  A------W       S---Q---B
                          \     / \     /
                           --M--   --R-- 

Thanks,
Lucy



> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> John E Drake
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 11:11 AM
> To: curtis@occnc.com; stbryant@cisco.com
> Cc: draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw@tools.ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org; pwe3
> Subject: Re: [mpls] [PWE3] Multiple RSVP paths
> 
> Hi,
> 
> A related ID:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kompella-mpls-rsvp-ecmp-00.txt
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Curtis Villamizar
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 8:30 AM
> > To: stbryant@cisco.com
> > Cc: draft-ietf-pwe3-fat-pw@tools.ietf.org; pwe3
> > Subject: Re: [PWE3] Multiple RSVP paths
> >
> >
> > In message <4C31E719.1060402@cisco.com>
> > Stewart Bryant writes:
> > >
> > > In response to a comment received during last call I have added a new
> > > section 7.3 entitled : "Multiple RSVP-TE Paths" which says:
> > >
> > > In some networks it is desirable for a Label Edge Router (LER) to be
> > > able to load balance a PW across multiple RSVP-TE tunnels. The flow
> > > label mechanism described in this document may be used to provide the
> > > LER with the required flow information, and necessary entropy to
> provide
> > > this type of load balancing. Methods by which the LER is configured to
> > > apply this type of ECMP is outside the scope of this document.
> > >
> > > - Stewart
> >
> >
> > Stewart,
> >
> > You could mention using a link bundle with the all ones component
> > link as a possibility but still leave further details out of scope and
> > not preclude other mechanisms that are local to the LER.
> >
> > Curtis
> > _______________________________________________
> > pwe3 mailing list
> > pwe3@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls