[mpls] Fw: I-D Action:draft-farrel-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-01.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 17 November 2007 20:49 UTC

Return-path: <mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItUbz-0008J0-UD; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:49:55 -0500
Received: from mpls by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ItUbx-0008HT-WF for mpls-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:49:54 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItUbx-0008H1-MQ for mpls@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:49:53 -0500
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com ([62.128.201.248]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItUbu-0003KR-10 for mpls@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:49:53 -0500
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id lAHKnn3H014592 for <mpls@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:49:49 GMT
Received: from your029b8cecfe (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lAHKnlT0014578 for <mpls@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:49:48 GMT
Message-ID: <047a01c8295b$60e3e550$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: mpls@lists.ietf.org
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:49:39 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Subject: [mpls] Fw: I-D Action:draft-farrel-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi MPLS working group,

This short I-D is proposing to impose some sub-ranges on the type values of 
LSP Ping TLVs to make them future proof.

Comments welcome.

Thanks,
Adrian

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org>
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:40 PM
Subject: I-D Action:draft-farrel-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-01.txt


>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>directories.
>
> Title           : Future-Proof TLV Codepoint Space for LSP Ping
> Author(s)       : A. Farrel, G. Swallow
> Filename        : draft-farrel-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-01.txt
> Pages           : 10
> Date            : 2007-11-17
>
> Techniques for detecting Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) data
> plane failures are described in RFC 4379 and include the definition
> of a control protocol for testing and verifying Label Switched Path
> (LSP) connectivity that is known as LSP Ping. The protocol consists
> of a set of messages each of which contains data encoded as TLVs.
>
> The LSP Ping protocol is being extended for several related uses.
> Each extension gives rise to the definition of new TLVs to be carried
> on the existing protocol messages.
>
> The LSP Ping specification makes it mandatory that all TLVs are
> understood by each participating Label Switching Router (LSR) that
> receives an LSP Ping message. This makes future extensibility hard
> without upgrading all LSRs in the network.
> This document defines ranges in the TLV codepoint space so that TLVs
> may be associated with different processing rules within an LSR if
> the TLV is unknown. This will make extensibility more simple.
>
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-01.txt




_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls