Re: [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "LS on work on MPLS-TP protection"

Scott Mansfield <> Fri, 25 March 2016 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D842812D9DB; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 06:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YljjAoWAzurg; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 06:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76C9C12D9D2; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 06:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-f79216d00000767f-6a-56f53b07548e
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AD.51.30335.70B35F65; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:20:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:44:05 -0400
From: Scott Mansfield <>
To: Loa Andersson <>, Ross Callon <>, George Swallow <>
Thread-Topic: New Liaison Statement, "LS on work on MPLS-TP protection"
Thread-Index: AQHReWsN33QuD9aqsUqHmAJV2r4Xbp9qDz0AgAA14zA=
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:44:05 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPrC679dcwg//PdC0+PbzEbPH351ZG i8td3ewWc+46W0x7bGbxb+4cZotbS1eyWvx5Pp/d4u+KKywWiyYvY7GY9fcCkwO3x8v+OYwe 8y4sZPOY8nsjq8f5b3tYPXbOusvusWTJTyaP601X2T1mTW9jC+CI4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mq4 uesaW8EqpYo9PUtYGxh3KHYxcnBICJhIHFsh1sXICWSKSVy4t56ti5GLQ0jgCKPE/CWHmCCc 5YwSn5ceYQKpYgNq2LprOiOILSKQK3Ht7iawDmaBx0wSxzf2sYAkhAXcJBZ+fMkEUeQusfPJ JCjbSmL1gUVgNSwCqhKn779lBrF5BXwlTvdtYga5SEggRuL+IS2QMCdQyepFLWwgNiPQdd9P rQEbwywgLnHryXwmiKsFJJbsOc8MYYtKvHz8jxXCVpTY1z+dHWQks4CmxPpd+hCtihJTuh+y Q2wVlDg58wnLBEaxWUimzkLomIWkYxaSjgWMLKsYOUqLC3Jy040MNjECY/aYBJvuDsb70z0P MQpwMCrx8BYUfgkTYk0sK67MPcQowcGsJML72/5rmBBvSmJlVWpRfnxRaU5q8SFGaQ4WJXHe 9W8vhwkJpCeWpGanphakFsFkmTg4pRoYjx9aonll+5St4Wsbtx6MvV40/efc9/uK6sIv1Zpv Uqi/fmtN6bTsRQd8ok6L2VVE1oZr3ihRkHZLPmp+dVnwIf+Dm0P1bDnf+7w+6airv2o3w/TF PLb3k999UGcPrVj778PS44WXheyPnziofeXbKY66U0UPEhKS5Uz/ZL933SEh8n3hkbjqCCWW 4oxEQy3mouJEAKfe8MDVAgAA
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Multiprotocol Label Switching Discussion List <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] New Liaison Statement, "LS on work on MPLS-TP protection"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:44:10 -0000

No problem.

I can fill in the boiler plate.  Can the experts/leaders for the MSPR and RMR provide some text as outlined by Loa below?  Also please let me know what PALS wants to say.


-----Original Message-----
From: Loa Andersson [] 
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 2:28 AM
To: Ross Callon; George Swallow
Cc: Alia Atlas;; Scott Mansfield;; John Drake; Multiprotocol Label Switching Discussion List; Deborah Brungard; Alvaro Retana;
Subject: Re: New Liaison Statement, "LS on work on MPLS-TP protection"


I've added the pals chairs, since pseudowire protection is mentioned.


I think a and polite polite response for information is needed,

- thank them for the information,
- if there is anything we need to say on pals work on (linear)
   protection (Stewart and Andy need to input
- acknowledge that we will complete the work on mpls ring protection
   (mention MSRP and RMR)
- wish good luck at the meeting in September

Can you compile this.


On 2016-03-09 02:48, Liaison Statement Management Tool wrote:
> Title: LS on work on MPLS-TP protection Submission Date: 2016-03-08 
> URL of the IETF Web page:
> Please reply by 2016-05-16
> From: "Hiroshi Ota" <>
> To: Loa Andersson <>,George Swallow 
> <>,Ross Callon <>
> Cc: Alvaro Retana <>,Deborah Brungard 
> <>,Multiprotocol Label Switching Discussion List 
> <>,Scott Mansfield <>,George 
> Swallow <>,John Drake <>,Alia 
> Atlas <>,Ross Callon <>,Loa 
> Andersson <>,,
> Response Contacts:, 
> Technical Contacts:
> Purpose: For comment
> Body: ITU-T SG15 wishes to inform the IETF mpls WG of an update to the ITU-T Q9/15 work programme to include a second amendment to Recommendation ITU-T G.8131/Y.1382 Linear protection switching for MPLS transport profile. This amendment will cover pseudowire protection based on Appendix A of IETF RFC 7771. The amendment is targeted for consent at the September 2016 plenary meeting of SG15.
> ITU-T Q9/15 has also been made aware of the initiation of work on MPLS-TP Shared-Ring protection (MSRP) mechanism for ring topology in draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-00, and has consequently re-initiated work on draft Recommendation ITU-T G.8132/Y.1383 Ring protection switching for MPLS transport profile. As ITU-T Q9/15 intends to reference and be aligned with corresponding normative RFCs, we would appreciate your assessment of the anticipated completion date for draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection as the target consent date for draft Recommendation ITU-T G.8132/Y.1383 depends on it.
> Attachments:
>      Liaison