Re: [mpls] 答复: MPLS WG last call on draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-03.txt

Sriganesh Kini <sriganesh.kini@ericsson.com> Mon, 23 September 2013 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7570521F89EB for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.525
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.525 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cmrbk9GGvISx for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877B021F83E2 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so3641941pdj.29 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=z8h6MHxAFW6+ty/BOYe0Xh/qj89kIrE8n44MQei/IZ8=; b=t27P7xUs44hYnSivHeUMF+a+edWyH/GHSJY9joDSzqgJ6b5CZzyVWFpkXP/5GaMbU/ QPNtTLmSf74mVYl2G5DqT4GVwXxf5mKtBs2t+5I27rh37XSqmshpZ7I0C93r9fsKqIVN GtHLEZuWlM7YqhbIH+8e2TwrfxXTM8TH+UsF0dP4kcbp1u9qAME0FmS0+3I+q9pmDIe4 pB2TFur4P67ImnZ5rvIOPonYMNuwJ7R8aHMjOox6mBgUqkwHArwn80229T/LK4Muh0qk yTRIgZUVYPqblXlzE5KYwPyA/C+GrgZ07QZNxIDK2h6mtGUF9+1u2kz65/8erPInSVwp iHfQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.196.168 with SMTP id in8mr25731241pac.18.1379965220949; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sriganeshkini@gmail.com
Received: by 10.70.0.225 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08211182@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <98952a55996f40da8cbcb663561f580b@BLUPR05MB070.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOndX-tKDYahywihZ8fAv3MyRRUHW2=cNG+FSfkNucpcLws0tw@mail.gmail.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08211182@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
From: Sriganesh Kini <sriganesh.kini@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:39:33 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: O9XtPE-aCWgXjDtR06sGf9w-7FM
Message-ID: <CAOndX-uiMYt_m=jxhPnr6v_cDRn1ZHeDzgjBDF74-_6TUzpzgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bdca8a4cc1a5e04e712309f"
Cc: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "fanyb@gsta.com" <fanyb@gsta.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] 答复: MPLS WG last call on draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:40:22 -0000

Hi Xu,

The existing encapsulations you pointed out were defined a long time ago.
Whereas the other two are just being proposed now. Moreover if we follow
this approach it will require standardizing UDP port numbers for each new
protocol to encap into UDP.

- Sri


On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> wrote:

>  Hi Sri,****
>
> ** **
>
> *发件人:* mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] *代表 *Sriganesh
> Kini
> *发送时间:* 2013年9月21日 7:06
> *收件人:* Ross Callon
> *抄送:* mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; fanyb@gsta.com
> *主题:* Re: [mpls] MPLS WG last call on draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-03.txt****
>
> ** **
>
> There is no reference cited for the "MPLS-in-IP" encapsulation.****
>
> ** **
>
> [Xiaohu] MPLS-in-IP and MPLS-in-GRE are actually specified in the same RFC
> that is RFC4023.****
>
> ** **
>
> What is the applicability of this encapsulation compared to the
> generalized mechanism in draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe ?****
>
> ** **
>
> [Xiaohu] The applicability of this encapsulation is the same as the
> existing IP-based encapsulations for MPLS (e.g., MPLS-in-GRE).****
>
> ** **
>
> Best regards,****
>
> Xiaohu****
>
> ** **
>
> - Sri****
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:*
> ***
>
> Working Group,****
>
>  ****
>
> This is to start Working Group last call on  draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-03.txt
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> Please send your comments to the mpls working group mailing list (
> mpls@ietf.org).****
>
>  ****
>
> Please send both technical comments, and (if you are happy with the
> document as is) ****
>
> also send indications of support.****
>
>  ****
>
> There is one IPR claim that applies to this draft, which can be seen at:**
> **
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1941/****
>
>  ****
>
> The coauthors and contributor have indicated that they don’t know of any
> other ****
>
> IPR applicable to this draft. If anyone else in the working group is aware
> of IPR ****
>
> claims against this draft, the time to disclose that is now.****
>
>  ****
>
> This working group last call will end on September 27, 2013.****
>
>  ****
>
> Ross****
>
> for the wg co-chairs****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>