IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] What percentage will carry indicator/ancillary data in the future

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 11 October 2021 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B083A0C3A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KkOyfq0m9Q_P for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212743A0C38 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id g10so69251979edj.1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7iS+omRyuGeAA6bP/QT7CoEgDV7U8MFs5rjFhJKSTkk=; b=dhF8ExjmIh0H5crSA9yj5rbcyCf+6nHSHAHAPlHtVnxN6U/v/eNz+/UpaiRtqEzgoU 1O5Z/z54BdGlVJw3jRT35UIR7xLXXgta79xL5gJFrs/H9JoEVOOZ6sGcN8BVDdjsb/Q7 ANa7oERm88Ox0ya43Fq51bbOBqPx/15b5vrsVUQzmT10VXQzNlgiDBNdS+Ee8FLd9cnJ WkHBxvJ+GEfKJywYKW/HECL8+0hnNeLAdkm2q92nzsW5lOG0XH/Rx22D6ZH18cz/jvQp UGkRoG8aOSnLPAWsXJNs6krV+A502bN1BbquGpvjY3RN1qlHEv8+R+t4IPxFD00mXTCr TXuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7iS+omRyuGeAA6bP/QT7CoEgDV7U8MFs5rjFhJKSTkk=; b=ENQc/1m62EOxZcP5f7McSWqBmDJeLY8lEPTVxqLZKZZMfj2Hj0cHU1LgAVQpaQi6XC KT81SfFqCyGDkaSC72wlt8t0KP6rC82EXdI48cKih3Gy7a506KwPU/uHEsvyuI0IY0L7 vsREMl9LOT06FrUNAZY+Lxf3D1Q25N170X/fnSBLx2g6r/UON+PprFJVymgJ4+bqQBfz eTj1LDh5/MXKSbdHVnfSipTRsAewbbklWrSKvSmRyFlnpmmTIP6rHnuNfeOGCzrP+G4B C6zVZf9EF1I9lpzH9rn/yeWoZ8KHKTJ92Uzq4O5363XZ8ikUpFJcRhFEXpKanaopnEwB ZREQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qfGKIPD+MzaNtKuthYyB6jBSgEf3nze9C3rNORhFKtl2dnQb8 nqTWSjN9bkaigtmm2ymPxwIXRLfV5knQglbcfCA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmSNK2Q8CRy0EhVi0HDOindpEJB4YRWroGw7ZRLkqfwLmFSYM7/w3AgEMGGrtvLNxaSns/jhUJCbSErG+AIn0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b208:: with SMTP id p8mr3056760ejz.477.1633969643728; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <f419b94c-b55b-d6b2-ca91-23c8f31f2677@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <f419b94c-b55b-d6b2-ca91-23c8f31f2677@pi.nu>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:27:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmW3eaSo2gUi5=KYHp8qAF0E+ykf1=ojaTmSZF0m=eoMHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000030319905ce163470"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/FdjT2xsZwxSglZlWtMR6phwxhKU>
Subject: Re: [mpls] What percentage will carry indicator/ancillary data in the future
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:27:32 -0000

Hi Loa,
I have a clarification question. As I understand it, FAI is to signal
ancillary data that is processed in hop-by-hop or end-to-end manner (John
proposed to have a separate indicator for each use case). The impact on
transit nodes is, likely, different. Do you think we need to consider these
cases separately?

Regards,
Greg

On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 10:43 AM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> Design Team,
>
> I have one thing that I been thinking about.
>
> If we consider future mpls encapsulated packet, what percentage will
> carry indicators and ancillary data?
>
> /Loa
> --
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email