Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp to WG LC
Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net> Fri, 27 June 2014 13:43 UTC
Return-Path: <yakov@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DAE1B31A2 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RqpSm9qRGITy for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1blp0184.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 542F11B2BD8 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR05CA0056.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.20.26) by BLUPR05MB104.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.214.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.959.24; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:43:41 +0000
Received: from BY2FFO11FD034.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c0c::111) by BLUPR05CA0056.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:855::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.974.11 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:43:41 +0000
Received: from P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net (66.129.239.16) by BY2FFO11FD034.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.14.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.969.12 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:43:40 +0000
Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net (172.24.192.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:43:40 -0700
Received: from juniper.net (sapphire.juniper.net [172.17.28.108]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id s5RDhbn40382; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:43:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yakov@juniper.net)
Message-ID: <201406271343.s5RDhbn40382@magenta.juniper.net>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <53A428C4.3020408@pi.nu>
References: <201406182028.s5IKS1n21555@magenta.juniper.net> <53A428C4.3020408@pi.nu>
X-MH-In-Reply-To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> message dated "Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:27:48 +0200."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <39111.1403876617.1@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 06:43:37 -0700
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.239.16; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(189002)(199002)(252514010)(51704005)(24454002)(377424004)(85852003)(76482001)(77982001)(74662001)(74502001)(84676001)(31966008)(50466002)(68736004)(86362001)(4396001)(16796002)(85306003)(19580395003)(79102001)(69596002)(21056001)(76176999)(54356999)(50986999)(83322001)(44976005)(19580405001)(46102001)(6806004)(64706001)(105596002)(97736001)(46406003)(95666004)(97756001)(23726002)(102836001)(92726001)(80022001)(92566001)(99396002)(20776003)(87936001)(106466001)(81156004)(107046002)(81542001)(83072002)(47776003)(81342001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB104; H:P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0255DF69B9
Received-SPF: SoftFail (: domain of transitioning juniper.net discourages use of 66.129.239.16 as permitted sender)
Authentication-Results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 66.129.239.16) smtp.mailfrom=yakov@juniper.net;
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/G9aUIznDVa9XD20oEEhSqBIaeXU
Cc: rcallon@juniper.net, mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp to WG LC
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:43:44 -0000
Loa,
> Yakov,
>
> et.al. we don't want to start more than one wglc per week, just now
> I have two wglc's going on alternate weeks.
>
> I have another one on queue for next week, but think I won't have that
> on ready. So there is a chance that I'll do draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-
> over-mldp, otherwise the week after.
Ok.
> You can get on wglc comment from me now; or really a question. The
> draft says that all the security consideration that are applicable for
> mLDP are applicable here. What about, are there no security
> considerations derived from PIM?
Since this draft just expands rfc6826 ("In-Band Signaling with
mLDP") to cover PIM SM in ASM mode, and since the security consideration
section of rfc6826, that covers PIM SM in SSM mode, does not say
anything about security considerations derived from PIM, and I
assume that there are no security considerations derived from PIM
in this draft.
Yakov.
>
> /Loa
>
> On 2014-06-18 22:27, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
> > Dear WG chairs,
> >
> > Given that draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp is fairly stable, could
> > you please issue MPLS WG Last Call on it.
> >
> > Yakov.
> >
>
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp to WG LC Yakov Rekhter
- Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp to WG… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp to WG… Yakov Rekhter