[mpls] Unify Terminologies for Network Slicing
Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Tue, 09 March 2021 11:19 UTC
Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022AE3A1A37; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:19:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A3J8c_dDaMYw; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8283A1A35; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:19:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DvswQ2zG4z67wCW; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:11:34 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.53) by fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:19:34 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.41) by fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:19:33 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.214]) by dggemm424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0513.000; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:19:31 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Unify Terminologies for Network Slicing
Thread-Index: AdcU1gXRuSvNSBc4TsSlgR4lr5iwXA==
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:19:30 +0000
Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D93A2730D@dggemm512-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.188.68]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D93A2730Ddggemm512mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/H5Yor0_9oT-E4ACPXmxGi50LnJs>
Subject: [mpls] Unify Terminologies for Network Slicing
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 11:19:45 -0000
Hi All, All following drafts has the similar idea to carry an ID in the forwarding data plane. The id is to represent the network slice. But there are different definitions for the ID (VTN ID, Slice ID, Slice Selector/Slice Aggregate ID, etc. ) in these drafts. At the same time, the slice has been defined as the north bound interface as the service. I suggest that the terminology must be unified in the TEAS WG firstly. Or else it will cause much confusion and mess which also have much effect on the work in other WGs. TEAS WG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-vtn-scalability/ MPLS WG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-mpls-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kompella-mpls-mspl4fa/ 6MAN WG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-stateless-slice-id/ Best Regards, Robin
- [mpls] Unify Terminologies for Network Slicing Lizhenbin
- Re: [mpls] [Teas] Unify Terminologies for Network… Joel M. Halpern