IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv

"Shaleen Saxena (ssaxena)" <ssaxena@cisco.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ssaxena@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DF911E820A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iUhizO7WzRI7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E95111E81FD for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1736; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363289814; x=1364499414; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=yY+TpeZuLmxHmtlr+NTAXhESCuyPvfYcsD0j9HBkN08=; b=B6iV/NJgyk72W872XLl/njJtrEc4YgVegpqvOWzCgU77ZDRKGNOZyqQm dMBXKJ3TJIsDF6ne84JTZoQQ3/0fhEpMQctuB0s9t/vltVqm1/Sb7KFs4 j5n/yC4Mhw2o2MeRKAho1j4w5ArjmwdmvWY8plqQDHmfhqS1hehL5+ufu 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAP0lQlGtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABDxQKBZRZ0gisBAQEEOjEDBgUMAgICAQgRBAEBCxQJBxsXFAkIAgQBDQUIiAzBcgSNURCBACYLBwaCWWEDp1qDCoFzNQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,846,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="187563876"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2013 19:36:54 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2EJarYv012237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:36:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.248]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:36:53 -0500
From: "Shaleen Saxena (ssaxena)" <ssaxena@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv@tools.ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv
Thread-Index: AQHOIOF2CXKrHb0i9kKo45DSnVcdz5illJ1g
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:36:53 +0000
Message-ID: <5942F95203B6A743BA212455F91E1B2F22E00F74@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com>
References: <51421655.4020709@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <51421655.4020709@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.71.111]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Shaleen Saxena (ssaxena)" <ssaxena@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:36:56 -0000

Hi Loa,

No, there is no IPR that I am aware of.

Regards,
Shaleen

-----Original Message-----
From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] 
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:26 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv@tools.ietf.org; Martin Vigoureux
Subject: IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv

Working Group and authors;

The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv has indicated that the draft is ready working group last call.

Since we never done an IPR poll on this draft we will do this before starting the working group last call to check whether there is IPR on the document that needs to be disclosed.

This mail starts that IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping- ttl-tlv?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The documents will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.


Thanks, Loa
(as MPLS WG co-chair)
-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consult)        phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email