Re: [mpls] repeat IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm

Ross,

I'm not aware of any IPR that relates to this document.

/Loa

On 2015-10-16 00:16, Ross Callon wrote:
> Oops, I hit "send" too quickly. The correct IPR poll should read:
>
> -----
>
> Working Group,
>
> The authors have told the WG chairs that draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm
> is ready for WG last call. A while back we did an IPR poll on this document.
> However, two new authors (Loa Andersson and Kaoru Arai) have been added since
> The original IPR poll.
>
> We are therefore repeating the IPR poll to allow Loa and Kaoru to respond. As always,
> any IETF participant who is aware of IPR that applies to this document should also
> respond.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
> RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? (we will note however that there
> are currently no IPR disclosures that apply to this document).
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor and you did not
> respond to the previous poll then please respond to this email regardless
> of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs
> to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.*
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Ross
> (as mpls wg co-chair)
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>