[mpls] New I-D draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-00.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 26 May 2015 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C041A92BC for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 09:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-fhIeobasQv for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AEE81A8A58 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 09:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain []) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4QGhxFg022778; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:43:59 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (jplon-nat11.juniper.net []) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4QGhqxL022700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 May 2015 17:43:56 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 17:43:50 +0100
Message-ID: <014501d097d3$2886a230$7993e690$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdCX0x/jsrMyNeBHQwaIxqAAuJBdzw==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.034-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.034-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: oxmVnmmssegUPclK4KPc4O8JHZsLQ3dUROshHNu2/QbadW4iYSMjUTrz 6vBw5SSAYKXU5x6vEGO7PTrrB/SScupla2Pf53gCHDC6a94U1AAt0t+aIVLt+5IuII6CcB9zvAC bPSJBQvVTQqkQQwuzhHLEXBbQP/X3HHJU/MR+nmH+OTCJja0mcvioIsi7Sa0gsneuamRRT5MlS2 /Vh4mBk9GQ9WjHMDp+i04MTR5lCKac95xD+Eo4wIDqq/69HfgsA7f8DkoYc/+bKItl61J/ybLn+ 0Vm71Lc3t//bkkogL4LbigRnpKlKZvjAepGmdoORnHlk9s6yGbG+8ObTk9D4QqSX3dz86emLGq7 AHLyteYjcxtjMwHleSUoHbzWqHX6XGulfAOPFxSLpI9YerHXKuxhnOjoI4Es5D9smqVBD9yilnn VDECPd/H7AvsTxZMb7DafdH0+BI7qCyYebl7X7A==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/IG1AA1qNfBQFkEaKVtidju-8bck>
Cc: 'Loa Andersson' <loa@mail01.huawei.com>
Subject: [mpls] New I-D draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:44:05 -0000


Sasha, Loa, and I put together a short draft to clarify behavior wrt the TTL and TC fields of the label stack entry that contains the GAL.

Nothing dramatic, just tightening things up for a few issues reported to us from implementation/interop/field.

Review and comments actively sought.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: 26 May 2015 17:37
> To: Loa Andersson; Alexander Vainshtein; Adrian Farrel; Adrian Farrel; Sasha
> Vainshtein; Loa Andersson
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-
> 00.txt
> A new version of I-D, draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> Name:		draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling
> Revision:	00
> Title:		Handling the TC and TTL fields in a Label Stack Entry when the
> Generic Associated Channel Label is Present
> Document date:	2015-05-26
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		6
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-
> handling-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-
> handling/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-
> 00
> Abstract:
>    This document clarifies handling of the Traffic Class (TC) and Time-
>    to-Live (TTL) fields of a Label Stack Entry that contains the Generic
>    Associated Channel (G-ACh) Label (GAL).  These clarifications are
>    intended to aid interoperability of implementations.
>    Original handling was defined in RFC 5586, and this document updates
>    that RFC.
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> The IETF Secretariat