[mpls] New I-D draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-00.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Sasha, Loa, and I put together a short draft to clarify behavior wrt the TTL and TC fields of the label stack entry that contains the GAL.

Nothing dramatic, just tightening things up for a few issues reported to us from implementation/interop/field.

Review and comments actively sought.

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 26 May 2015 17:37
> To: Loa Andersson; Alexander Vainshtein; Adrian Farrel; Adrian Farrel; Sasha
> Vainshtein; Loa Andersson
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-
> 00.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling
> Revision:	00
> Title:		Handling the TC and TTL fields in a Label Stack Entry when the
> Generic Associated Channel Label is Present
> Document date:	2015-05-26
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		6
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-
> handling-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-
> handling/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-
> 00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document clarifies handling of the Traffic Class (TC) and Time-
>    to-Live (TTL) fields of a Label Stack Entry that contains the Generic
>    Associated Channel (G-ACh) Label (GAL).  These clarifications are
>    intended to aid interoperability of implementations.
> 
>    Original handling was defined in RFC 5586, and this document updates
>    that RFC.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat